so you agree then: we should shake out this dusty rug and replace the entire democratic party leadership with younger people who will actually do something instead of just backstab the people who will
Replies
We don't get to choose that for "the entire leadership'. Voters do. For example - I don't KNOW what Chuck Schumer's VOTERS want or demand of him or voted for etc. I don't have a say in that. In my district and state? Well, we nominated Bernie twice, and voted for the women twice.
jul 8, 2025, 11:27 pm • 2 0 • view
do you think chuck schumer listens to the people who elect him and what they want? or do you think he listens to the israel lobby, and the whispers of an imaginary voter he dreamed up entirely inside his head?
jul 8, 2025, 11:29 pm • 3 0 • view
I don't know. Nor do you. We need to focus on taking down Republicans now. You can help reform the Dem party later. There IS no other group that can take on the fascists and their billionaire donors.
jul 8, 2025, 11:31 pm • 1 0 • view
they are literally the group that enabled them to take power, rob they are currently in congress crushing everyone who acts up against it, and voting to confirm his appointments and policies the president has a >20% approval rating among democratic representatives, man
jul 8, 2025, 11:47 pm • 1 0 • view
Name any cabinet appointee they could have blocked. Name any legislation they had the votes to block.
jul 9, 2025, 1:18 am • 0 0 • view
they're not even trying dude
jul 9, 2025, 1:24 am • 1 0 • view
So, no. We can't name a single thing they could actually block. Meaningful action would be nice, but what is that?
jul 9, 2025, 2:36 am • 0 0 • view
can you name how many they blocked, how many they convinced Rs to turn around on? vs how many Dem defectors allowed the nominations to go through anyway?
jul 9, 2025, 3:48 am • 1 0 • view
because only one of these theories is backed by evidence
jul 8, 2025, 11:30 pm • 0 0 • view