Which is exactly why I’ve asked people which candidates I can support that align with their agenda. None of you offered shit. They only bitch and tell me to figure it out. Good luck progressing a cause with that approach.
Replies
Maybe they haven't been super forthcoming because you've acted like an aggressive weirdo and kept accusing everyone of all sorts of horrible stuff
aug 31, 2025, 4:02 pm • 23 0 • view
No, this started when I asked Parker a genuine question that was not leading in any way, shape, or form. People responded aggressively. bsky.app/profile/lonn...
aug 31, 2025, 4:10 pm • 0 0 • view
I mean she'd already answered that question pretty clearly in the post you were replying to. I imagine people thought you were trolling
aug 31, 2025, 4:11 pm • 20 0 • view
She did not. She did say that she wouldn’t vote for him. I asked if that means she’d vote Republican, third party, or not vote at all. That answer wasn’t clear in her post hence why I asked for clarification.
aug 31, 2025, 4:21 pm • 0 0 • view
You know full well that she wouldn't vote GOP, which is why people saw it as a bad faith post.
aug 31, 2025, 4:25 pm • 18 0 • view
aug 31, 2025, 4:35 pm • 3 0 • view
So you got an answer, didn't like it, and you asked another one in bad faith
aug 31, 2025, 5:09 pm • 3 0 • view
Yo. Sice you're a sealion, I gotta jump in and not let some shit slide. Human rights are not pizza toppings, and if you are aaking me in the binary of we *all* lose our rights, or just trans people, I will not throw them under the bus to save myself or you. We all float or we all drown you dick
aug 31, 2025, 4:33 pm • 6 0 • view
Ever heard of “a rising tide lifts all ships”? You’d rather destroy the ship so everyone sinks. That’s pure evil. You’re no ally to any cause you “support”.
aug 31, 2025, 4:56 pm • 0 0 • view
Was slaughtering thousands of civilians and deporting more people than Trump's first term "lifting all boats?" Sure seems like the only one ignoring the past is you buddy
aug 31, 2025, 5:11 pm • 3 0 • view
Sir, if we have to drown one boat to make the tide rise, its not "all" ships is it, you fucking peice of shit
aug 31, 2025, 4:57 pm • 6 0 • view
This is the problem. Trans people aren't humans to you. They dont fit your category of "ship" Why on earth should I fucking caucus with you or give a single care about your political opinions?
aug 31, 2025, 5:00 pm • 6 0 • view
They’re absolutely humans. Don’t put words in my mouth. You’re all saying that I need to support candidates who support trans people’s rights and I agree with you. But you’re willing to sacrifice ALL of the other causes you “support” if one cause isn’t included on day one. Work towards progress.
aug 31, 2025, 5:18 pm • 0 0 • view
because a candidate that starts by sacrificing one group will only continue to sacrifice more, and we’re done endorsing people that don’t care if we live or die asshole
aug 31, 2025, 5:33 pm • 1 0 • view
I am. You are the one that thinks minorities may be an "acceptable" sacrifice to keep *your* tide rising. And I am telling you, since you need *my* vote, not the other way around, that we don't let anyvody drown So stop equvicating, and pick a real candidate
aug 31, 2025, 5:20 pm • 3 0 • view
wtf is wrong with you?
aug 31, 2025, 4:23 pm • 4 0 • view
then why did you respond 2 days ago saying "not voting?" You know full well what the answer was
aug 31, 2025, 6:10 pm • 2 0 • view
If the only way I’d vote for Newsom is if you made and posted a video of yourself eating a big wet shit sandwich, would you take a bite? Or do you want trump to win
aug 31, 2025, 4:29 pm • 3 0 • view
I’d eat the big wet shit sandwich in this dumb hypothetical because I know how bad things are for all people under Trump and that he intends to make them worse. It’s called sacrificing my own wants to better the lives of others. Look into it.
aug 31, 2025, 4:54 pm • 0 0 • view
So not in real life, only hypothetically? Enjoy Trump I guess 🤷♂️
aug 31, 2025, 5:03 pm • 2 0 • view
Otherwise post the video
aug 31, 2025, 5:04 pm • 0 0 • view
You enjoy Trump as well. He’s doing a lot to help Palestine who you claim to support in your profile.
aug 31, 2025, 5:20 pm • 0 0 • view
Ah so there it is, you’re a Trump supporting troll who’s sewing division in the Democratic Party by touting Newsom
aug 31, 2025, 5:22 pm • 3 0 • view
Why didn’t you say so from the beginning
aug 31, 2025, 5:22 pm • 0 0 • view
You’re the one who is willing to abandon the Palestinian people in trans people’s rights aren’t met. I’ve never once supported Trump. Look at any of my posts, likes, etc., dumbass.
aug 31, 2025, 5:33 pm • 0 0 • view
This would work if democrats hadn’t murdered 200,000 Palestinians, but to absolute dipshits like you history began when Trump was inaugurated It seems like you were willing to sacrifice Palestinians and you still lost. Now you’re trying to trade trans people for just a little more “safety” for you
aug 31, 2025, 5:36 pm • 1 0 • view
We see it and we’re fucking done man. Go vote Republican like you probably have before just stop continuing to fuck over the Democratic Party with your devils bargains
aug 31, 2025, 5:38 pm • 0 0 • view
How have republicans helped stop the Palestinian genocide? Exactly. At least some democrats are pushing back. Not a single republican is. But you want to bitch about all democrats.
aug 31, 2025, 5:48 pm • 1 0 • view
I dunno man, when you're telling people that they should be happy to throw their rights away just to win the next election I can totally understand why they tell you to fuck off. But if you're so pressed to figure out someone people actually like maybe check out his Pritzker guy, if this helps
aug 31, 2025, 4:02 pm • 2 0 • view
Agree on Pritzker. Thank you. My point is that progress takes time. 100% of your agenda won’t be met by one candidate. If Newsom is the eventual nominee, I’d vote for him and vote for progressive candidates to put pressure on him to change. Republicans will never advance any of our causes.
aug 31, 2025, 4:19 pm • 0 0 • view
See, that smug 100% thing is why people are reacting poorly. Do you think a billionaire like Pritzker is 100% aligned with progressives? No one is asking for 100%, and Newsom has still failed. You can scold the voters or you can put that energy toward preventing the bad candidate from being nominee.
aug 31, 2025, 4:23 pm • 8 0 • view
how did this exact line work out under Biden?
aug 31, 2025, 4:24 pm • 4 0 • view
We were making plenty of progress just fine without abandoning people until now. Maybe that's because instead of pushing back against conservative propaganda the Dems stayed silent. Maybe that's the reason people aren't willing to back them anymore
aug 31, 2025, 4:21 pm • 3 0 • view
Also also, "no one candidate will give you everything you want" the minimum here is just not throwing away trans people with a dash of "stop funding a genocide" these aren't some insurmountable asks and if your chosen candidate can't do that they shouldn't be the candidate. Period
aug 31, 2025, 4:22 pm • 1 0 • view
I support those two causes. If the eventual nominee supports trans people’s rights and supports stopping the Palestinian genocide, but they refuse to reinstate women’s rights to an abortion, how would you vote?
aug 31, 2025, 4:32 pm • 0 0 • view
These hypotheticals are pointless at this stage because we are still 3 years away from a presidential election and no one has thrown their hat in the ring. If large swaths of people saying they won't vote for a guy if he decides to run then maybe he just shouldn't run. That's the takeaway here
aug 31, 2025, 4:36 pm • 2 0 • view
You might as well be saying "what if the nominee said he would put a laser on the moon to protect the planet from alien invaders" it's incredibly stupid and pointless because that person isn't running because no one is right now
aug 31, 2025, 4:38 pm • 2 0 • view
I completely agree with you. This started with Parker’s hypothetical about 2028. I didn’t create the hypothetical. I asked for clarification on what it meant for her vote or non-vote in her hypothetical. I’m more than happy to help promote many candidates over Newsom. I hope he doesn’t run.
aug 31, 2025, 5:00 pm • 0 0 • view
She did not make a hypothetical. She is just stating her opinion after people started speculating that Newsom was going to run for president. You don't seem more than happy to promote other people since you demand other people do the work of finding someone else to support. Find someone yourself
aug 31, 2025, 5:06 pm • 0 0 • view
Not that I didn't notice from the start, but the more I'm interacting with you I totally understand people telling you to fuck off. You're annoying, grating even. You have this smugness about how you think you're correct but aren't offering anything either. Just smug condescension. Work on that
aug 31, 2025, 5:11 pm • 0 0 • view
No one wants to talk to you because you come off very aggressive and not terribly believable
aug 31, 2025, 4:15 pm • 4 0 • view
Equal rights isn’t too big of an ask. It’s not impossible for a candidate to say “Equal rights for all” equal meaning equal, rights meaning rights and all meaning all.
aug 31, 2025, 4:07 pm • 3 0 • view