I made a quantum foundations alignment chart — go forth and fight about it! (also, "good" is not an endorsement)
Replies
Why not make good/evil/neutral refer to judgement of the wavefunction? So, move QBism down to Chaotic Evil, put objective collapse at Chaotic Good, and consistent histories at Chaotic Neutral. And swap Bohm w/ Everett. Neutral good's stance is the QM math needs no interpretation ("idk, seems fine").
aug 30, 2025, 10:39 pm • 1 0 • view
* judgement -> reality
aug 30, 2025, 10:42 pm • 0 0 • view
Ah yes, "needs no interpretation" would have been good to include (though I guess some would call that "Copenhagen"). What does "neutral" mean with respect to the ontic/epistemic distinction? In any event, my aim was more lighthearted trolling than earnest classification!
aug 31, 2025, 1:08 pm • 0 0 • view
Really nice !
sep 2, 2025, 4:51 pm • 1 0 • view
Funny
aug 31, 2025, 1:24 pm • 1 0 • view
Maybe not, but stray to evil at your peril!
aug 30, 2025, 9:33 pm • 1 0 • view
Nice one :)
aug 30, 2025, 10:20 pm • 1 0 • view
Blame @dangaristo.bsky.social and @kpc.bsky.social for egging me on
aug 30, 2025, 9:27 pm • 3 0 • view
What are friends for if not this tbh
aug 31, 2025, 3:26 pm • 2 0 • view
Where do consistent histories go?
aug 30, 2025, 9:48 pm • 1 0 • view
In my grab-bag category for interpretations that I know very little about!
aug 30, 2025, 10:07 pm • 1 0 • view