If your arguments have any merit then I encourage you to submit your work to a journal for peer review. Then I'll read them.
Replies
The Cass report was not peer reviewed, and you've read that 🤔
sep 2, 2025, 9:18 am • 3 0 • view
I'm afraid you have been misinformed.
sep 2, 2025, 9:37 am • 1 0 • view
I wish I could take your incorrect statements seriously but alas they are not peer-reviewed and therefore meaningless. Please publish them appropriately so that we can finish this discussion 👍
sep 2, 2025, 9:43 am • 3 0 • view
So, I think you're relying on the technicality here that the final report itself wasn't peer reviewed, but was a synthesis of seven systematic reviews which were peer reviewed. I'm happy to acknowledge that, but your use of it as a "gotcha" is really rather dishonest.
sep 2, 2025, 9:55 am • 1 0 • view
The final report was not a synthesis of the systematic reviews that were conducted by York university. There was a great deal more in the report, including many trivial errors and a great deal of bizarre and often unscientific theorising.
sep 2, 2025, 10:47 am • 3 0 • view
As I wrote in my articles on the topic, I had very few issues with the work done by the York team. Generally well-done studies, although a few arguable points. The final Cass report, however, was filled with mistakes and went far beyond the data from the York team.
sep 2, 2025, 10:51 am • 5 0 • view
One of the useful things about peer review is it means you have to be able to demonstrate to other scientists that your arguments are systematic and address tangible and significant knowledge gaps in the literature. If you can't show that then why would I read your work?
sep 2, 2025, 8:13 am • 1 0 • view
Hilarious that you're spouting this while also praising the sham Cass Report that wasn't peer reviewed.
sep 2, 2025, 9:28 am • 1 0 • view
I'm afraid you have been misinformed.
sep 2, 2025, 9:37 am • 1 0 • view
The Cass Report is not peer reviewed. Your disdain for facts doesn't change the facts.
sep 2, 2025, 9:39 am • 0 0 • view
So, I think you're relying on the technicality here that the final report itself wasn't peer reviewed, but was a synthesis of seven systematic reviews which were peer reviewed. I'm happy to acknowledge that, but your use of it as a "gotcha" is really rather dishonest.
sep 2, 2025, 9:54 am • 1 0 • view
Lmfao, it's not a gotcha, it's reality. She has zero expertise in the subject and cherry picked bullshit based on her gut vibes. The Cass Report has repeatedly been debunked.
sep 2, 2025, 10:03 am • 0 0 • view
Cass was one of, if not the tope paediatrician in the entire country. She was absolutely world class. The idea that she lacked expertise in evidence-based treatment for mentally ill children is just ridiculous.
sep 2, 2025, 10:06 am • 1 0 • view
And you're still relying on the dishonest framing of the "Cass report" when what Cass actually lead was The Independent Review of Gender Identity Services for Children and Young People. The final report was just a synthesis of seven systemativ reviews. Here's links to them:
sep 2, 2025, 10:07 am • 1 0 • view
Actual experts debunked this repeatedly. Clinging to the notion it doesn't need to be peer reviewed because she cherry picked from other peer reviews is nonsense. bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
sep 2, 2025, 10:10 am • 0 0 • view
law.yale.edu/sites/defaul...
sep 2, 2025, 10:10 am • 0 0 • view
LOL do you even know who "Natacha Kennedy" is???
sep 2, 2025, 10:23 am • 0 0 • view
Interestingly there's only six systematic reviews listed on the journal's website. I wonder where the seventh is? web.archive.org/web/20240410...
sep 2, 2025, 10:21 am • 1 0 • view
Taylor J, Hall R, Langton T, et al. Care pathways of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109:s57-s64. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:19 am • 1 0 • view
Taylor J, Mitchell A, Hall R, et al. Masculinising and feminising hormone interventions for adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109:s48-s56. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:18 am • 1 0 • view
Taylor J, Mitchell A, Hall R, et al. Interventions to suppress puberty in adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109:s33-s47. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:18 am • 1 0 • view
Heathcote C, Taylor J, Hall R, et al. Psychosocial support interventions for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109:s19-s32. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:17 am • 1 0 • view
Hall R, Taylor J, Hewitt CE, et al. Impact of social transition in relation to gender for children and adolescents: a systematic reviewArchives of Disease in Childhood 2024;109:s12-s18. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:16 am • 1 0 • view
Taylor et al. (2024). Characteristics of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review. adc.bmj.com/content/109/...
sep 2, 2025, 10:15 am • 1 0 • view