not this tweet oml 😭

Unruh using that Matt Bors cartoon as his avi is kind of a thing of beauty

guys I'm confused which Hitler are we voting for three years from now

they somehow keep talking themselves into this point.

A system that only produces Hitlers as an option clearly shouldn’t be allowed to continue creating Hitlers.

Exactly! What I fucking said! Why are Liberals so afraid of systemic change?

the purpose of the system is what i desire it to do

whispering "false dichotomy" over and over to myself this summer so I don't go fucking insane

If you’re in a room with three Hitlers holding a gun with two bullets, make them all fight to the death and shoot the winner twice.

Correct

bsky.app/profile/tass...

how is it that the fictional fantasy character geralt of rivia has a better handle on this false dichotomy than libs?

you have to love it when people dream big

not the first to note this, but it's worth repeating: Liberals love thought experiments where they get to vote for Hitler

To the tune of If It Makes You Happy “99per-cent Hitler”

Liberals keep trying to justify voting for 99% Hitler

In France, we call these people "centrists". This is not a compliment.

Je voudrais immigrer à France... 😞

in american election system you have to choose from 2 so you must vote for the 1% less hitler

He's done it!-- found the worst version of the trolley problem

Pretty sure the moral obligation is to kill the two Hitlers before they divide even further like a virus. I mean how many mfers over the decades have talked about time machines and Hitler?

Now I, an unenlightened idiot, see a secret third way involving doing something about both 100% and 99% Hitler that doesn't involve a ballot box But maybe I dont see the obvious reason to throw up my hands and go "well ONE of these guys has to have the job, not like we could have run anyone else."

Fascists are actually counting on people to vote for 1% better Hitler. That way they get to install a Hitler that has an appearance of popular support. It's what fascists do they put you in a situation where you can choose to become complicit or not

I wonder what sort of machine you put a Hitler in to determine the exact level of badness.

Oh, my head hurts. Two hitlers? They can be cellmates. At the Hague.

I like that these dudes are always trying to act like morality has D&D rules. "Ah, but see, the one Hitler rolled a nat 20, therefore you failed the morality check."

“Don’t blame me, I voted for Hitler”

‘With an unconditional basic income, Hitler would have remained a painter.’ ‘Con un ingreso básico incondicional, Hitler hubiera seguido siendo pintor.’

You shouldn't be allowed to use the word moral while your only moral stand is voting for any version of Hitler

they just really love the term ‘viable candidate’ dont they

It means be a white man and be as mild as cream of mushroom soup

I mean if you find yourself in a booth on voting day, but people aren't being asked to vote for Hitler-lite against Hitler, they are being asked to commit to supporting Hitler-lite as the best possible of all possible opponents for Hitler, years in advance.

I think if you have gotten to that point your system has already failed and needs replacing. People act like political bodies, institutions and laws are permanent, they can be changed though!

Like you can know which can has more beans and also know both of them put together is not enough beans for the stew

bsky.app/profile/halb... I refuse the question and won't vote for either Hitler

What if there are three other Hitlers all of varying degrees of Hitler but they have different policy strengths like choosing a Kart in Mario Kart? Which one would you choose? The one with braking ability or