The president has a bully pulpit that reaches 100’s of millions of people. By his slander/defamation attacks, he has caused me irreversible damage to my reputation… Boom!! Trump has dozen of these law suites out there.
Replies
Reach isn't an element of defamation.
sep 2, 2025, 5:12 pm • 13 0 • view
Not to mention calling for her to be fired!! That’s loss of income!! She should get herself a good lawyer and sue the crap out of him
sep 2, 2025, 5:22 pm • 0 0 • view
You have a First Amendment right to call for anyone to be fired.
sep 2, 2025, 5:26 pm • 10 0 • view
And you have the right to sue
sep 2, 2025, 5:27 pm • 0 0 • view
You have a right to pay the fee and file a lawsuit, yes. But if the lawsuit is a SLAPP suit, ie you're suing over constitutionaly protected speech, then you could end up owing the person you sued a large sum of money.
sep 2, 2025, 5:28 pm • 2 0 • view
Sure. And if you don't present prima facie evidence of all the elements of the tort you can be sanctioned or held to an Anti-Slapp law if you live somewhere with one.
sep 2, 2025, 5:28 pm • 9 0 • view
Sorry guys, she had every right to sue Trump for calling her dumb asked for her firing at ABC
sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 1 0 • view
No, friend. That would be a SLAPP suit and would result in her owing substantial amounts of money if she sued over these comments.
sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 10 0 • view
Yet this is ok. Got it! www.newsweek.com/trump-abc-ne...
sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 1 0 • view
Again, you're confusing your own morality for the law. If you weren't so attached to your own bigotry, you might actually learn something about the law.
sep 2, 2025, 5:35 pm • 1 0 • view
Yup. And that demand has no legal basis. It was a settlement. The only thing the court found is that it was improper to dismiss because it could be potentially proven ABC had defamed him.
sep 2, 2025, 5:35 pm • 9 0 • view
Donna has every right to go after Trump
sep 2, 2025, 5:36 pm • 1 0 • view
I mean sure. She has the right. And if her lawyers lie to the court and say they had cause to file the suit the court has every right to force her to buy Pam Bondi a yacht.
sep 2, 2025, 5:31 pm • 1 0 • view
Well, your boy Trump wants more money from ABC for Donna’s comments. I guess that is ok
sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 1 0 • view
You're confusing your morality for the law. If you weren't so attached to your own bigotry, you might learn something from legal professionals in the field of law.
sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 2 0 • view
I’m not. I’m seeing an unfair justice system.
sep 2, 2025, 5:34 pm • 0 0 • view
You are reeeeeallly into the element of damages. One of 4 elements for defamation. Do you have any evidence for the other 3? Because going in there with just damages is going to lead to her owing Trump money.
sep 2, 2025, 5:24 pm • 1 0 • view
Not if she gets fired or gets death threats. I mean, how much did Rudy have to pay? How much did ABC have to pay to Trump? Judge even said he raped her! www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
sep 2, 2025, 5:27 pm • 2 0 • view
Rudy defaulted. It isn't relevant to this case as these aren't precedential matters. What is the falsifiable statement of fact?
sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 2 0 • view
Rudy chose to default on his case. ABC settled after it was found that their specific statement could be proven false and wasn't covered by substantial truth doctrine. None of that is at play here. For a better example of how this case would go, see Clifford v Trump or Trump vs Clinton et all.
sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 2 0 • view
“By his slander/defamation attacks, he has caused me irreversible damage to my reputation” Defamation has to be a statement that could be proven true or false, so statements of opinion aren’t defamatory. Again, Trump fucking sucks, but that doesn’t make your understanding of the law correct.
sep 4, 2025, 4:49 am • 2 0 • view
Damage is an element of defamation but hardly the only one. If she cannot prove falsity amount other things she can have all the damage in the world and she loses .
sep 2, 2025, 3:56 pm • 3 0 • view