I understand what you’re getting at. When you add in drop off rates and public confessions then I say that’s enough to warrant a more thorough audit/recount. Have you heard about the NC vote tabulators?
I understand what you’re getting at. When you add in drop off rates and public confessions then I say that’s enough to warrant a more thorough audit/recount. Have you heard about the NC vote tabulators?
My constant question to ETA is: If this fraud happened, how did it avoid detection during the several layers of audits and technological methods designed to detect fraud? There WAS a manual recount of a statistically significant number of ballots.
The counties that ETA detected anomalies were not the ones audited
? Which counties exactly?
This is what is referred to as Gish gallop. I don't play this. One post, three claims in an attempt to deflect from the first www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfalla...
1) drop-off bsky.app/profile/r5-t...
2) Trump/elon words bsky.app/profile/r5-t...
3) NC "machines" Vague and unspecific. This may answer what you are hunting at bsky.app/profile/dbma...
I don't see a way to respond to your additional points re: not agreeing with looking at drop-off rates, etc. Perhaps that's on purpose. Doesn't seem like a genuine attempt to discuss the issue. tsk tsk
YOU. not anybody else added several claims to the thread Focus
Nothing malicious intended. My question involves vote tabulators in use in NC that are listed as using a Cisco router that has not been secure since 22.
Focus on equipment and read @dbmain.bsky.social posts and reply with substantive questions if you have them and avoid adding distracting comments