Any SCOTUS that betray the constitution & laws of the country should be jailed.
Any SCOTUS that betray the constitution & laws of the country should be jailed.
Just impeach the ones who took bribes.
SCOTUS malfeasance called out by lower courts is a path @democraticags.bsky.social can use to defy them. Constitutional wonks will argue that’s impossible. But SCOTUS justices aren’t kings and their poor decision making is destroying the Republic. They need to be stopped. @chrislhayes.bsky.social
This opinion is just going to further the disdain toward lower district courts that has been exhibited by the SCOTUS conservative majority.
So be it. There are more honest Judges than there are crooked. SCOTUS 6 are the mafia court & should be called out on opinions that show obvious flouting of the constitution & laws. Many written by them! Hypocrites!!
These 6 Supreme Court Justices are enabling Trump & Republican Party lawlessness! John Roberts - Chief Justice Thomas Clarence Samuel Alito Brett Kavanaugh Neil Gorsuch Amy Coney Barrett The media needs to focus relentlessly on SCOTUS corruption. @meidastouch.com @adammockler.com @votevets.org
Every branch of the fed. govt. is undermining its own power. Ultimately, the blue states will ignore them as their blatant bias increases. And that’s where the real power in the US lies. The revenue blue states raise from its own citizens dwarfs red states. Cutting off the federal govt will end it.
They have zero respect for them now. You can’t “further disdain” something you already don’t care about. Also: The lower court has scrupulously followed their own tortured ruling: obeying the new standard set by the corrupt court. If OBEYING them makes them mad… then what’s the alternative?? 🙊🙉🙈??
So? Let 'em be big mad. They didn't wrap themselves in glory, either.
Mango,scrotus and the regressive party will continue to ignore the constitution, congress and the courts until impeachment and those around him are arrested.
Well put. Bravo!
Brilliant.
It's made up and fabricated law with zero supporting statutory documentation, language or precedent.
It will be interesting to watch as the SCROTUS Gang of Six makes new shit up to overrule their own previous ruling. But declaring a Constitution unconstitutional requires mental gymnastics that only makes sense to...well nobody actually. Kind of a mental Mobius strip of evil.
The Federalist Gang of 6 will next accept the case on the shadow docket, rule 6-3 in favor of the regime without comment,because f you, that’s why. That’s the new normal.
The SCOTUS needs to be updated to reflect reality: Supremely Corrupt Ruling On Trump’s Unchecked Misdeeds (SCROTUM)
"interesting" is not the word. But you know, I know, everyone knows, that whatever past case law may say, SCOTUS is going to decide this 100% in the way Trump wants. It is no longer a "court", it is a partisan political institution
I'm sure the strongly worded ruling will put a stop to it..... meh
I love judicial opinions that come with an extra helping of salt.
Alito in the upcoming decision overruling the injunction: "Wait. What? We really didn't mean it."
I remember how the Roberts Rogues Pretended to leave room for issues they didn't consider. But when Montana said it bans political contributions by corporations because in their state, when such contributions were allowed, the entire government of the state was corrupted, they said get f*cked.
📌
The anger just sizzles from some of these opinions...may the force be with every judge who continues to try and preserve our country from this evil, corrupt and ignorant administration and its supporters.
📌
🧨💥🔥😎✌️
Alito will find an obscure 16th century catholic mystic to cite to overrule his previous statement.
"According to this outdated history book from Prager University, child sacrifice was legal in 6th Century B.C. Lebanon, therefore a judge cannot declare unborn children a class and these orders cannot be enforced. We do not rule on the merits of the issue at hand" Trump vs All Babies Born in the US
Ah, but then he'd be admitting that unborn children aren't "people" entitled to the same (or more) rights as adults. Imagine what happens to all the Pro-life decisions after that.
They make up some other piece of horse baloney to make their original feelings fit their made up facts.
SCOTUS is far enough down the White Supremacy line that they will just say “ The founders were European therefore BRC is for white babies only!” The GOP will march out Tim Scott to buck dance while explaining how good it is for America.
“…and furthermore, take your ‘end-run around the court's decision’ and shove it as far as possible up your prostituted derrière…”
I think Alito just wanted one baby, one lawsuit at a time — with every baby not suing thereby stripped of its rights.
Basically, yes. Which is a ridiculous premise. Can you imagine how backlogged the courts would be if each member of a protected class had to sue individually to protect their individual rights? The courts would grind to a halt.
This is what Alito wanted for grantees from whom Trump withheld payment — treat the matter as a garden variety contract dispute and have each grantee individually litigate in the federal Court of Claims. That’s absurd by design.
[sic]
I confess, I don't know half of what you're talking about most of the time - but if it's on this feed - I like it and repost it anyway.
any time they point out (SIC) I giggle
These 6 Supreme Court Justices are enabling Trump & Republican Party lawlessness! John Roberts - Chief Justice Thomas Clarence Samuel Alito Brett Kavanaugh Neil Gorsuch Amy Coney Barrett The media needs to focus relentlessly on SCOTUS corruption. @meidastouch.com @adammockler.com @votevets.org
That's beautifully done.
Who says "for-bidden"? Seriously who are these people?
📌
Oh, that’s nifty as well as good.
#CelebrateWins
Love this. "Hey Alito! Fuck you!"
Alito: BUT!
Judicial precision makes for the best snark