Chuck Schumer does not do succession planning in any way that matters, Nancy Pelosi had to be forced into it by an intraparty coup, Obama deliberately eschewed it
Chuck Schumer does not do succession planning in any way that matters, Nancy Pelosi had to be forced into it by an intraparty coup, Obama deliberately eschewed it
Indeed, Obama fucked it up. All he had to do was give Joe the nod and he’d have whipped Trump in 2016.
We love keeping our powder dry forever, don't we folks
He didn't give him the nod because it was Hillary's turn. An exchange for Bill helping Obama in '12. I thought this was common knowledge
tbf Warren could do more on this front but what are Porter, Pressley, and Wu if not deliberately chosen protégés
Presuming that Markey or Warren retires soon, I do think Wu would have a good shot at the senate – assuming she wins reelection as easily as I think she will
Porter - literally the frontrunner for President of California Pressley - widely considered to be a contender for higher office, no offices have opened Wu - one of the most popular and successful Mayors in the country you can argue she has a better batting average than Sanders!
yes, but she takes swings a lot less whereas Bernie tries to get likeminded people everywhere—it's different approaches that I don't think lend themselves to easy comparison
she swings less but hits more, that's my point. like, i'm fairly certain Warren endorsed Mamdani first
both were post-primary so neither gets any credit imo
sure, i guess