avatar
Ms Ruby Scarlet ♾️♿✒️🎨🦄☘️🍉 @msrubyscarlet.bsky.social

No, there’s nothing socialist about this. It is literally Fascism.

aug 24, 2025, 10:28 pm • 3 1

Replies

avatar
tiadee1031.bsky.social @tiadee1031.bsky.social

Sen. Rand Paul = Trump’s plan for the U.S. government to take a stake in Intel. “If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn’t the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism? Terrible idea,” Fascism is having a totalitarian state led by a single ruler or party

aug 24, 2025, 10:56 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ms Ruby Scarlet ♾️♿✒️🎨🦄☘️🍉 @msrubyscarlet.bsky.social

1. Socialism is not the “government” owning the MoP 2. A share in a privately owned business is not ‘control of the means of production’ 3. The symbiosis of capital and power to their mutual benefit, as in this case, is called fascism

aug 24, 2025, 11:09 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
tiadee1031.bsky.social @tiadee1031.bsky.social

I even quoted Bernie and Rand Paul 🙄

aug 24, 2025, 11:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ms Ruby Scarlet ♾️♿✒️🎨🦄☘️🍉 @msrubyscarlet.bsky.social

I was disagreeing with Rand Paul’s characteristically obtuse take on the situation, rather than taking task with you personally :)

aug 24, 2025, 11:41 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ms Ruby Scarlet ♾️♿✒️🎨🦄☘️🍉 @msrubyscarlet.bsky.social

The word was coined, and defined, by a guy called Mussolini. Look him up. He also called it “corporatism”.

aug 24, 2025, 11:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Rob Montague 🇺🇸 @rob-montague.bsky.social

If you hold the controlling block of shares you effectively own the company. It doesn’t have to be the majority of shares.

aug 25, 2025, 12:28 am • 1 0 • view