Oh, those zionists. Sorry, what does that have to do with Israel and the conflict in Gaza? You know since Israel bought their land from the Brits during the British mandate during which the Palestinians got thrown out of Jordan for trying to overthrow the Jordanians.
The UK took control of Palestine because it was on the route to British India. India became independent and Palestine was not so important to them; also Israeli terrorists were killing British soldiers and Britain wanted to be rid of the problem. Britain sold nothing to Israel: they had no right to.
Britain handed the problem to the UN. The UN was America’s tool at that time. The President needed Jewish votes to get a second term in the upcoming election. The US ensured Israel was recognised. But Israel in 1948 was given much less territory than it has now. The stealing went on until today.
Yes, since everytime Palestinians lost a war israel extended their territory. That’s how war works. Where the losing side secedes territory to the winner to erect buffer zones. That’s why the golan heights for instance are Israeli territory today, they earned it In warfare.
They had the right since they owned and controlled the land since they won the war . That’s how war works. It was never Palestinian land to claim as their own.
Oh yes, might is right! Russia has every right to keep every bit of the Ukraine they can conquer according to that rationale. What you say is contrary to international law and is therefore criminal. Zionism is criminal and the world is waking up to that fact thanks to people like you.
Russia hasn’t won, and won’t win, but if they did, then yes - they would keep Ukraine. You wouldn’t call Ukraine criminals for creating buffer zones on Russian soil after Ukraine wins, would you? Zionism is criminal now, is it? Your side sound more and more like Hitler every day.
I sound like Hitler? You are the one saying that a state has the right to invade another state and if it is militarily stronger, if it can occupy territory and hold it, then it has the right to keep it. That was the Nazi plan. That is the Zionist plan. That is the Israeli plan. We see a second shoah
No I didn’t. I said it would keep it - not that it had the right to invade it. But Israel had no owner before the British mandate, it was a battle of five nations where Britain stood victorious. It wasn’t a plan by Zionist to get oct. 7th’d . It was the plan of Hamas.
Even in the 19th Century all land had owners. Israel didn’t exist then. Zionists did not own that land called Palestine. I suggest people read the books of Ilan Pappé, an Israeli historian or even Wikipedia. Hamas made a big mistake: they did not realise Israel would sacrifice Israelis to get Gaza.
That’s Hamas’s big mistake? You don’t think relying on jobless academics for sympathy was a bigger mistake? Or asking for empathy from the west while you praise Hitler and his teaching? These are far worse mistakes made by Palestinians. Israelis did own the land , according to below:)
Yes Hamas’s big mistake was thinking Netanyahu’s government would withdraw the IDF from Gaza in order to release the hostages. Hamas offered that on 9 October 2023. But Netanyahu wanted an excuse to remove or deport all the Gazans to make the land part of Eretz Israel - the Israeli Empire.
Israel is also trying to take over the West Bank; it is attacking Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. With your reference to Eretz Israel you reveal Israel’s colonial ambitions. How long will the world tolerate Isreal’s wars that kill innocent civilians, destroy culture, destroy the environment?
That’s not true either. Eretz Israel means land of Israel not Israeli empire. Hamas offered to give back the hostages they stole, that is not an offer. That’s redemption. Something they failed to do as they killed them. Hamas biggest mistake in that regard was stealing the people to begin with.