It doesn’t contradict me. I’m saying trans women aren’t women, and the dictionary agrees yet again. They don’t produce ova. Which is why you find trans women described under trans women and not women. They’re trans.
Replies
Except the dictionary calls them women. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth" The dictionary disagrees with you and calls them women.
sep 2, 2025, 7:05 am • 1 0 • view
A woman who is male at birth is still a male . Still produces spermatozoa and not ova.
sep 2, 2025, 7:07 am • 2 0 • view
Yet the dictionary still calls them a woman, despite being male. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth" They are women.
sep 2, 2025, 7:09 am • 0 0 • view
Correct, which is why trans women needs the trans- part. Trans women are trans women, not women.
sep 2, 2025, 7:12 am • 1 0 • view
Yeah? Because they're trans. Correct is right. Trans women are trans women. Trans women are women. They need the trans part as much as black women need the black part or blond women need the blond part.
sep 2, 2025, 7:17 am • 0 0 • view
Yes, however it’s an additive that negates the premise. Women can be black and blonde, they can’t produce spermatozoa though. Trans women do.
sep 2, 2025, 7:20 am • 1 0 • view
They are still women though. Even if they produce spermatozoa. The dictionary you used said so. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"
sep 2, 2025, 7:22 am • 1 0 • view
They aren’t, they don’t fit the description. A male woman doesn’t stop being male post operation. They only end up with a mutilated penis and not female genitalia producing ova.
sep 2, 2025, 7:25 am • 1 0 • view
Tell that to your dictionary. "Mutilated penis" or not. Ova and/or spermatozoa producing. They are still women by definition of that same dictionary. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"
sep 2, 2025, 7:30 am • 0 0 • view
It says ”woman who was considered…..” not ”a woman.” It’s definitionally different.
sep 2, 2025, 7:32 am • 1 0 • view