Yet the dictionary still calls them a woman, despite being male. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth" They are women.

Correct, which is why trans women needs the trans- part. Trans women are trans women, not women.

Yeah? Because they're trans. Correct is right. Trans women are trans women. Trans women are women. They need the trans part as much as black women need the black part or blond women need the blond part.

Yes, however it’s an additive that negates the premise. Women can be black and blonde, they can’t produce spermatozoa though. Trans women do.

They are still women though. Even if they produce spermatozoa. The dictionary you used said so. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"

They aren’t, they don’t fit the description. A male woman doesn’t stop being male post operation. They only end up with a mutilated penis and not female genitalia producing ova.

Tell that to your dictionary. "Mutilated penis" or not. Ova and/or spermatozoa producing. They are still women by definition of that same dictionary. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"

It says ”woman who was considered…..” not ”a woman.” It’s definitionally different.

"[a woman] who was considered..." It is definitionally different. Yet they are still women by definition. They are still mentioned as women by definition.

They aren’t . They aren’t female. Women are female. They are women only to the extent of the suffix caviat.