avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

The whole idea of putting a human conscioness in a synthetic body does my brain in. To my mind it means you died and a synthetic has stolen your identity. But then I dont feel the same about cyborgs. Maybe the difference is adding to vs moving? Maybe I see the soul as immovable

aug 16, 2025, 10:05 pm • 23 0

Replies

avatar
Andy Zeigert @zeigert.com

The whole idea depends on the transfer being fully destructive for the source brain. Which is a kind of suicide. If it was non-destructive and your original brain survived, which one would be you? Certainly both would claim to be you. Reminds me of the end of The Prestige.

aug 17, 2025, 5:40 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Alt Ordo Malleus @nikkicecily.bsky.social

I feel like if you digitize your brain that’s a soulless copy, but if it’s your actual brain it’s you

aug 16, 2025, 10:24 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

Yeah i think something like that too. Though I'm not sure the soul is in the brain, I think your soul relies on the relationship to it's whole body. Maybe it would be better to say internal sense of self is preserved in the brain? But just transporting the information is just making a copy

aug 16, 2025, 10:27 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

But for someone outside looking in, the person is the same. Only the internal has changed.

aug 16, 2025, 10:28 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Alt Ordo Malleus @nikkicecily.bsky.social

That’s where I find the HORROR. The idea of some lifeless program taking everything that is me and using it to live a mockery of life is creepy!

aug 16, 2025, 10:30 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

Of course we are already using AI to do a version of this. That is the logical conclusion though. Complete replacement

aug 16, 2025, 10:32 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Alt Ordo Malleus @nikkicecily.bsky.social

Complex, uncomprehending machines communicating meaninglessly, into infinity. Pure anti-humanity

aug 16, 2025, 10:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tristan Wright? @tristanwright.bsky.social

I feel the same way about transporters in Star Trek. As far as I’m concerned those things completely obliterate a person every time they are used, then rebuilds them elsewhere. A copy of a copy of a copy. But it makes a pleasing chime sounds so nbd.

aug 16, 2025, 10:32 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dustin @32mbit.bsky.social

Had the same thought while watching Alien: Earth. A copy is being made and your existence ends IMO! I also think this about the transporter in Star Trek

aug 17, 2025, 4:21 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Emily Dare @strangetree.maenad.club

To me it depends on the method used. But I don't see the soul as unmovable. Though if you're referencing what I think you're referencing, I totally think they are making copies and killing the originals, there.

aug 16, 2025, 10:07 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

Yeah they are 100 percent synthetics that think they are human.

aug 16, 2025, 10:17 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

So since you can't move the soul bringing the synthetic to the soul makes more sense to me.

aug 16, 2025, 10:05 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
aejae.bsky.social @aejae.bsky.social

This is tantalisingly close to being a full monologue from Ghost In The Shell.

aug 16, 2025, 10:26 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sarah Horrocks @mercurialblonde.bsky.social

I mean this is what ghost in the shell is about largely

aug 16, 2025, 10:33 pm • 0 0 • view