People should learn to drive in the most basic car possible, without driver aids such as parking sensors, reversing camera etc. in order to understand what to do when something goes wrong with the tech when actually driving
People should learn to drive in the most basic car possible, without driver aids such as parking sensors, reversing camera etc. in order to understand what to do when something goes wrong with the tech when actually driving
The ideal would also be for driver's tests to be simulated so real life hazards could be put in.
Statistically, skills don't improve; cars do. The standard driving licence syllabus, including theory test, should include the fact that 100% of drivers think they're in the top 50% of ability; and actually they're all human, shite, and need all the help they can get not to crash and die.
What’s the point? In 20 years time nobody will drive anywhere. The machines would have taken control.
A lot of drivers should spend a year walking and cycling.
They should remove the fuse from the power steering too!
Funnily enough, I did learn in such a car...
Heading towards a trained incapacity...👀
do you know how your keyboard actually works? Until you do, perhaps you should just do cursive on paper.
Or start them on a small motorbike. It raises awareness of what is around you far more than sitting in a metal box.
A bike
First car 1966 was an Austin A30 which jumped out of second gear and had a switch on dashboard for pop up indicators; passed on an Austin A35 which seemed luxurious. Dad taught me to double declutch.
With manual transmission.
This is the main thing stopping me going electric. Automatics are so dull Also if you pass inan auto you can't drive a manual
As someone whose offspring is currently learning how to drive - nowadays learning how to use driving aids, and how to cope without them, is part of the syllabus. Tl;dr: standard boomer opinion that everything should be the same as back in their day.
I don't think it is. Driving aids are such now that its like the difference between a manual and automatic. If you learn the basics you can add the bells and whistles, just like a manual license allows you drive an automatic, but not vice versa.
OK, was merely talking from my daughter's own experience with her instructor this week, but you're fine to believe otherwise.
It's not a boomer attitude to recognise that learning the basics is important - its not people just wishing for the old days, its people - the children of boomers - understanding how things work.
And because insurance is so punishingly expensive, for the first few years, young drivers can only afford to drive a small old 2nd hand petrol manual drive with no bells and whistles
Exactly - if you can drive the most basic 15yr old manual Fiesta you can drive anything which is handy until you have a spare £40k for a car that drives for you. If you pass in your parents car that makes all the decision you should get a restricted license, like for automatics!
I think you can avoid driving aids by wearing rubber gloves.
You only get that from toilet seats.
That's the guy!
It's anecdotal evidence but I'm afraid I for one am going to have to agree with OP. Our oldest managed to shred a tyre during parking four times in her first year and to this day is convinced that it's the car's fault because it didn't have 360° cameras like the one in which she learned to drive.
Agreed. I have parking sensors/rear view camera etc but just came from a holiday where the rental car had none of that.
all drivers should learn to drive in an Automatic first. You need to learn how to drive the car in relation to the road and traffic on it before worrying about gears etc. Once you have mastered road craft, you can advance. surgeons dont start with brain surgery.
Are you USian? 🤔
It's not exactly brain-surgery though. In 5 - 10 hours you go from 'what's this round thing in front of me' to being able to control the car and move it about comfortably. The rest is about learning what to do in traffic.
maybe not, but some tools still manage to live their whole lives without figuring out how to drive or interact with other traffic
It's not difficult enough for it to be worthwhile removing. And knowing how to drive manual means you can have cheaper and lighter cars.
i didnt say dont learn, I said learn to control the car in traffic first without distraction of gears, then learn to drive a manual. if you drive on our roads you'll know why its imperative people learn how to interact with other traffic better than they do.
Whose roads are yours? You've got me wondering where you're from.
And be able to shoe and ride a horse just in case this car and all bikes also go wrong?
Heck, the car I learned to drive in had a manual choke and window winders. It didn’t even have two wing mirrors.
Did it have two mirrors before your lesson?
No, a wing mirror on the passenger door used to be an optional extra, (like a radio, and a heated rear windscreen.) In the eighties, most cars were really basic.
Unless your pic is over 20 years old, you’re not old enough to have driven a car without at least a driver side wing mirror: became a mandatory MOT requirement in 1978
I learned to drive in a Vauxhall Nova in 1988. The car was maybe five years old. It didn’t have a wing mirror on the passenger door. And yes, I’m blessed with youthful good looks.
Can confirm. My C-reg (1985?) Vauxhall Nova didn't have a passenger-side wing mirror. Also, the MOT doesn't require a car to have equipment it wasn't legally required to have when it was built. So feel free to jump about on the back seat! No rear seat-belts!
My C reg nova did, someone must've splashed out when it was new.
Maybe that wasn't the original door! Which variant was it? Mine was the 1.2 litre two door salon. I think it is fair to say that it was the least desirable version.
1.0 (993cc 45hp) merit in silver moss metallic. Like this one (except mine didn't have side repeaters or a roof rack)
Did it stall every time you pressed the clutch?
Bring back the man with the red flag as well
People should ride a bike in traffic when learning to drive. Then maybe they'll pay more attention and be aware of the danger they present, and put their phones DOWN!
Do they let you use a rear camera during the parallel parking part of the exam? I thought they didn’t
Don't these new Tech-riddled cars shut down completely immediately they blow a fuse?
Absolutely. They get hooked in these things.
Preferably with no electric starter, automatic choke, power steering or servo assisted brakes as well yeah?
You should have to assemble it before being allowed to drive it too.
That's how it was in Romania.
I have a car with manual choke, starting handle and no power steering. It does have an electric starter and servo assisted brakes, though. It also has sixteen forward gears and four reverse gears. It's the most fun car to drive I've owned. Managed to get it up to 70mph a few times...
Yes. Its how I learned to drive in 2004. If you can drive like that you can drive anything. If you learn with all the bells and whistles you're stuck when the bells and whistles are gone - hence the automatic license thing.
I had a young female driver complain that “the steering had locked”. It was actually just a power-steering failure. She’d never driver a car without PS before and had no idea turning the wheel could be that hard.
I really struggled to learn to park when I got power steering... my arm movements and effort didn't match the movements the car made. Having been taught by an ex rally driver I feel less in control in new cars. I want to use the car, not have it use me!
I did. No power steering, manual choke. Over a quarter of a century since that car limped into the scrapyard, I haven't needed to use any of the additional skills I learned driving it. Still the experience is helpful when boomers and gen-x-ers start condescending me about how cars used to be.
A lot of people would benefit from doing the cbt and spending 6 months riding a scooter before graduating to a car.
It would certainly train them to be more aware of their presence on the road, and to actually see vehicles other than cars.
I certainly noticed the difference going from the car I learned in (a 1993 Austin Metro) to my first car (a 1985 Vauxhall Nova). It didn't have all the gadgets I was used to, like a ... fifth gear... automatic choke... umm... passenger-side wing-mirror... a key-hole in the passenger door...
Yes, or these things should all be turned off, even more so on the test.
My greatest day will be sometime around 2050 when all of the bugs of self driving have not only worked out, but it’s a mandatory item for all cars going forward. I SO look forward to the day when angry Chads on the road aren’t able to aggressively break every traffic law that exists.
How’s that going to help? The cars don’t revert to 1980s technology magically when there’s a failure of modern tech..
I don’t know what sort of car your instructors had, but I learned, 12 years ago, in a Vauxhall Corsa. The only addition was dual foot controls, so my instructor could stop me ploughing into a pedestrian or a bus. I didn’t, by the way.
A lot of us did that, including a manual choke 😉
They're talking about the young people just learning to drive. They won't have a clue what to do when their system goes down.
No car is going to grow a choke control on the dash if the automatic one stops working though. And they’re not that hard to work
No modern car even has a choke anymore, that's caveman tech. Cars today have fuel injection.
Today’s “modern cars” are electric
I'm talking about cars, not four door golf carts.
You’re hilarious, do you tour with that material?