If you look up the precincts in Orange County NY you’ll find the exact same voting patterns for Harris in precincts comprised of these Hasidic Jews.
Replies
By using the same logic, we see that Kamala tried to steal Oklahoma. TEN PRECINCTS WHERE TRUMP DIDN'T GET ANY VOTES!!11!! results.okelections.gov/OKER/?elecDa...
sep 2, 2025, 3:27 pm • 1 0 • view
If Musk, Eaton, Tripp Lite, etc, did what was contended, they can do it again, and elections will NEVER be safe again. So the urgent thing is to prove whether the data is correct or not. So hand recounts are needed. If the data IS NOT RIGHT, then what will be done for the primaries. Paper ballots!
sep 2, 2025, 3:37 pm • 0 0 • view
The tripp lite stuff is nonsense. Thiswillhold lied about what Tripp Lite devices are used within the ES&S configuration. Furthermore, they are OPTIONAL devices. Would you predicate a huge election fraud scheme on OPTIONAL devices? thepianosaletters.substack.com/p/no-starlin...
sep 2, 2025, 3:41 pm • 3 0 • view
Recount the data. It is literally that simple. Trump filed over 60 fraud cases for the 2020 election and they did tons of recounts. Why is the 2024 data so sacred it can't be recounted? This is as bad as not releasing the Epstein files. Recount the data. Release the files.
sep 2, 2025, 4:01 pm • 0 0 • view
It WAS recounted. Via the Risk Limiting Audits. PA. GA. AZ. OH.
sep 2, 2025, 4:05 pm • 2 0 • view
You people are fighting the wrong battle. It isn't just about the data. It is about who had access to the voting equipment (hardware/software), who had the push technology, who had the apps to 'scrub' afterwards, how the changes were implemented, etc.
sep 2, 2025, 3:36 pm • 0 0 • view
Respectfully, I say it's you that's fighting the wrong battle. If we pretend that Harris actually won, we can convince ourselves there is no corrective action to be taken on policy, messaging, etc.
sep 2, 2025, 3:44 pm • 1 0 • view
Also, respectfully, you folks seem like you think you're the first to think that machines can be hacked. You're not. There are up to 4 legislatively-mandated audits that are performed. Each machine is required to perform cryptographical verification of the software image upon boot.
sep 2, 2025, 3:44 pm • 1 0 • view
I am a data architect by profession. It isn't just the hardware. People don't understand data models, data software, provisioning, how to alter data, etc. Advanced technology is worse because the trail is harder to track. Any app can be hacked. Pretending it can't happen puts us at grave risk.
sep 2, 2025, 3:59 pm • 0 0 • view
Once again, we're not "pretending it can't happen". I'll say it again: It can. It's why we have layers of audits and technological schemes to detect it. When confronted with the challenge of "how did it go undetected?" the conspiracy theories expand to cover it.
sep 2, 2025, 4:03 pm • 1 0 • view
I don't know why anyone would fight so hard, in the face of the motivation of the billion dollar hacking and ransomware industry, to resist the idea that the most consequential application in the US, maybe earth?, has been hacked. Validate the data.
sep 2, 2025, 4:09 pm • 0 0 • view
I don't know why anyone would fight so hard, in the face of reality, to not educate themselves on the matter they are so passionate about.
sep 2, 2025, 4:14 pm • 0 0 • view
You want states to take extraordinary and extra-legal means to satisfy your hunch. Without spending a few minutes to learn about the procedures that would detect the fraud you're so sure happened.
sep 2, 2025, 4:14 pm • 1 0 • view
I think what is happening in America would justify extraordinary measures to protect Democracy. All systems can be hacked. Put a system in place that cannot. It is that simple.
sep 2, 2025, 4:17 pm • 0 0 • view
For years people HAVE pretended the voting system, because of the 'layers of audits', was sacrosanct. It can happen, many of us believe it DID happen, but it needs to be proven. Again, paper balloting is about the ONLY safe way to hold an election in a digital world that is EASILY hacked.
sep 2, 2025, 4:06 pm • 0 0 • view
You seem to be unaware that about 96% of the 2024 votes were on paper ballots.
sep 2, 2025, 4:08 pm • 0 0 • view
Have they been recounted and compared to published results? The data needs to be recounted and compared to published results. DHS said, after initial reports, the penetration was far broader in 2016 than originally suspected. Point is, there was evidence of Add, Alter, Delete. Their words.
sep 2, 2025, 4:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes, they have been recounted and compared to published results. At this point, doesn't it seem obvious that you don't really know anything about the systems and voting procedures, and that would be a good step before propagating conspiracy claims?
sep 2, 2025, 4:16 pm • 0 0 • view
You can do your own research. DHS claimed data wasn't altered, but later said it was far worse than originally stated. Bad actors have been trying to influence our presidency for years. That's a fact. Looks like they were successful 2024, but as long as data isn't validated, we won't know. TTFN
sep 2, 2025, 4:16 pm • 0 0 • view
Respectfully, recount the data. If it is wrong, there is a problem that no amount of 'messaging' can correct. End of story. DHS found evidence of hacking in 2016, so no one is pretending this is new. I've posted about it for years. Older technology then (Add, Alter, Delete), Russia/China.
sep 2, 2025, 3:54 pm • 0 0 • view
A) They got into registration systems, not election systems. In all the years you've been posting it, have you read the report? B) And yes, they can be hacked. It's why we have layers of audits and technology to detect it. Are you familiar with Risk Limiting Audits? That's literally a recount.
sep 2, 2025, 4:00 pm • 1 0 • view
That was one link. There are more reports, more information. There was evidence of penetration. There were servers being established by Russia in the US. Much, much more. That was the older client/server technology in 2015, when Russia had an entire operation. 2024 was digital smart technology.
sep 2, 2025, 4:03 pm • 0 0 • view
There's a report that has evidence of penetration of electronic tabulators? Link please
sep 2, 2025, 4:09 pm • 1 0 • view
Not that I doubt what you’re saying but frankly that makes no sense…Why would they support the down ballot Dems only to abandon the presidential ticket to Reps? You’re telling me hundreds Hasidic Jews are the *entire* bloc and they ALL vote exactly as the Rabi says? Seems a stretch.
aug 31, 2025, 7:12 am • 0 0 • view
I’ll let you look it up yourself so you don’t accuse me of linking you biased info, but simply look up “Orthodox Jewish Bloc Voting” and you’ll see everything I’ve said is true,
aug 31, 2025, 1:10 pm • 2 0 • view
Oh I’m not doubting it entirely it just seems wild to me that the *entire* district are orthodox Jews. Like there’s not a single non-Jew Dem voter in these districts that would have voted Harris? In one district there was over 1000 votes counted and she literally got one vote. Very odd.
aug 31, 2025, 5:53 pm • 0 0 • view
The precincts in Ramapo are pretty small but I’m guessing you’ve not been there before? The Hasidic Jews are a massive part of the population which is how they’ve taken over the school board and local elected offices.
aug 31, 2025, 6:25 pm • 1 0 • view
Wow, interesting. No, never been there. If you’re correct guess it’s not impossible. There is still this business of a large % of voting machines given an unannounced “update” weeks prior to election though. Highly suspect IMHO. Thx for the dialog. www.msn.com/en-us/politi...
aug 31, 2025, 11:24 pm • 0 0 • view
That substacker doesn't know what she's looking at. They have no election or computing background, and she misinterpreted the ECA certification report. Ironically, without the change, the system's technological methods to DETECT hacking wouldn't have worked.
sep 2, 2025, 3:32 pm • 1 0 • view
So will you be deleting your "statistically impossible" posts as it seems you did no statistics and just saw low vote totals for Harris. Now you do that old goalpost moving attempt bsky.app/profile/dbma...
sep 2, 2025, 2:01 am • 0 0 • view
No, no I won’t because you haven’t convinced me of anything other than your bluster with a generous amount of assumptions in tow. You however can feel free to keep on scrolling.
sep 2, 2025, 7:16 am • 0 0 • view
Also, explain to me how there were record numbers of *new* Dem registrations and yet, in what was clearly a huge threat to Dem way of life and democracy as a whole 19M Dems just sat out? Yeah, I’m not buying it.
sep 2, 2025, 7:19 am • 0 0 • view
Your numbers need updating. Biden, 2020: 81,284,666 votes Harris, 2024: 75,017,613 votes And there's enough post-election analyses based on polling to show where the Biden voters went: Rogan-inspired young men, and Latino men.
sep 2, 2025, 3:38 pm • 2 0 • view
You’re welcome. Let’s continue to keep discussing as the case gets heard in three weeks.
aug 31, 2025, 11:27 pm • 1 0 • view