American cities saw massive population drops from 1950 through about 2000, this created a surplus of infrastructure and amenities per capita. By capping housing demand/ prices rose as pollution and crime declined.
American cities saw massive population drops from 1950 through about 2000, this created a surplus of infrastructure and amenities per capita. By capping housing demand/ prices rose as pollution and crime declined.
A surplus of infrastructure per capita means a surplus of tax dollars per capita to maintain it.
Now convince a voter. youtu.be/dccWrg2VtYk
I am a voter. Wtf are you talking about? Jesus you’re bad at this.
JFC, I'm trying to explain how this is a political problem that can't be solved with facts and charts. That's the fundamental problem with this discourse.
I mean we've seen progress on this issue in recent years because of advocacy by the nerds with the charts. You are right that facts and charts rarely convince voters but they can convince organizers and leaders.
And I’m explaining to you that you don’t understand what people want.
Trump won or did you not notice. Sunbelt cities are also now seeing the same NIMBY pressure as Coastal metros.
Trump won because our country is racist. It’s time to take make NIMBY illegal.
You got to win an election first.
That was called white flight. It was a racist retreat from the cities into the suburbs. And it is proof that public perception can change very quickly.
Also people buy into the density they want and aren't happy when it increases.
All you’re really saying is that people don’t like change. Well too bad. Change happens.
Some people might be like that. But you’re making broad blanket statements with absolutely no data to support them. In general, I find that people enjoy when more amenities come to their neighborhood. The population is growing. We need more homes. End of story.