avatar
Position Light @prrsignal.bsky.social

Great, let them demonstrate they care.

aug 31, 2025, 1:42 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Sasha || commission me a mech @n13e86.bsky.social

If you can make use of that platform while violating their terms of service, you are clearly capable of doing it on any other platform.

aug 31, 2025, 1:45 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Position Light @prrsignal.bsky.social

The rules are the same everywhere, but what matters is how much people care to enforce them. The truck is not finding the platform with the laxest rules, but the laxest enforcement.

aug 31, 2025, 2:52 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sasha || commission me a mech @n13e86.bsky.social

They are not "the same everywhere". Boosty has a long definition of what they consider pornographic. Itch, for example, doesn't.

aug 31, 2025, 3:03 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Position Light @prrsignal.bsky.social

Somehow I think the sanctions busting platform won't bow to pressure from an Australian morality group. That's the problem here, not the platforms, but the platforms bowing to external pressure groups because they are vulnerable to legal actions and politics.

aug 31, 2025, 3:09 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sasha || commission me a mech @n13e86.bsky.social

Anything Collective Shout would want to ban, is already banned there by the site's terms of service. And if you think they won't bow to anyone, there's quite a few news articles about them banning bloggers and news media upon Russian government's request.

aug 31, 2025, 3:10 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Position Light @prrsignal.bsky.social

And how aggressively do they enforce them because they aren't enforcing the sanctions stuff.

aug 31, 2025, 3:12 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sasha || commission me a mech @n13e86.bsky.social

Imagine asking why a platform owned by Russian government is not enforcing sanctions against its beneficiary owner...

aug 31, 2025, 3:13 am • 1 0 • view