Why not just go higher since you're making shit up? How about 1000%! You'll look even more credible with that! #protips

And, what exactly are you going off of for 1/3? Please cite your scientific study. In the meantime, I'll admit my assessment is from personal experience. Over my long life talking about privacy vs law enforcement in situations like this, very few of the people I know would have sided with me.

Oh now you're interested in verifying information after you get called out. That's not how it works. Burden of proof is on your original claim, and "because im old" isn't a valid source. You're perfectly capable of looking up the data you're talking about, is not up to me to spoon feed that to you.

1. You made a specific claim yourself. If all you had said was, "I challenge your 'vast majority' claim", then no burden of proof would have fallen to you. But, you didn't, you claim it is specifically 1/3, and thereby have made a positive claim you are responsible to prove.

2. Additionally, my suspicion is you 'made your number up' based on your own anecdotal experience, simply because of the way you worded it: " IF THAT". Such wording is usually understood colloquially to mean that a person is speaking from their own experience.

3. It is, in fact, very similar to my wording: "MORE LIKE ". This also is usually understood to mean the person is stating an opinion and not making a scientific claim. These facts about conversation point to just how ridiculous and strange you are being.

4. And when I reflect that strangeness back to you, you become angry, defensive, and derisive. I am now done with this conversation. Have a good day.

Also 🖕 take a break from social media.

You just made up so much bullshit about me and what this whole exchange was about with that rant. 😆 Logical fallacies are not instructions ffs, get over yourself and stop posting your opinion as data driven facts. Be an adult