No, you proved nothing.
No, you proved nothing.
But I did. Show me how what I said is false.
No.. you need to show it is true.
I did lol. I explained what Occam’s razor was and how it applied to this situation. How is what I said false?
No, you proved nothing. You just stacked suppositions to make your plot seem tenable.
That would only be true had she not lied under oath. I specifically pointed that out.
Plus, you’re using the either/or fallacy. Everything she says must be false. Grownups know better.
The grown-up position is to weigh her credibility against evidence, not blindly accept her word as the “simplest” answer.
And again, if she were implicating Trump, you’d accept every word.
By your own logic, this is deflection then. 🙄 do you just not know how to defend your position? Cause you suck ass at it so far. bsky.app/profile/demi...
And by your own logic, you just confirmed my point…
This just sounds to me like, had she said trumps name, you’d likely NOT believe her and I imagine for the same reasons I don’t.
Good defection there…
Wrong. I don’t trust lying child predators like you apparently do.
That’s not an either/or fallacy on my part. I never claimed everything Maxwell says must be false. My point is that invoking Occam’s Razor to default to her truthfulness doesn’t work, because her history of lying makes that assumption less parsimonious, not more.