Sorry, he was 17. Kyle Rittenhouse was in possession of a Smith & Wesson M&P 15, an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle, on the night of the Kenosha shootings. He was 17 years old at the time. Do you live under a rock?
Replies
BTW. You never answered my questions. Why? 🤔
aug 23, 2025, 9:33 pm • 1 0 • view
The semantics of whether its semi-auto is irrelevant. With a hairpin trigger there are people that can fire just as fast as some full auto weapons. If that dipshit wasnt there with a gun, would Rosenbaum have attacked him? Im guessing no. Thats why he has no culpability.
aug 23, 2025, 9:55 pm • 0 0 • view
If that woman didn't wear a short dress......
aug 23, 2025, 10:22 pm • 1 0 • view
You were wrong about the assault rifle reference. Also, that's a page from victim blaming 101. Kyle had just as much right to be there as Rosenbaum. However, Kyle wasn't reckless & looking for trouble. That would be Rosenbaum. Chances are, he would've attacked someone else.
aug 23, 2025, 10:21 pm • 3 0 • view
Terrible analogy. Child walking down the street trying to be cool with a "long barreled" gun. Basically all that was missing was a sign asking to have his ass kicked. Would you want your child doing this?
aug 23, 2025, 10:51 pm • 0 0 • view
Nobody knew his age. In the context of where he was, against a backdrop of scores of people openly armed with rifles and other firearms, he wasn’t particularly conspicuous. Nobody appeared to be alarmed or gave him a second look in the videos where he is seen walking along Sheridan Road with Balch.
aug 24, 2025, 2:01 am • 2 0 • view
WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed. Additionally, there's no scenario where being armed forfeits your right to self defense.
aug 23, 2025, 11:00 pm • 2 0 • view
I didnt know kids could open carry. This coming from the party that thinks kids seeing gay people makes them gay. But you are totally fine with kids going to riots with guns. Make it make sense.
aug 23, 2025, 11:11 pm • 0 0 • view
"I didn't know kids could open carry" Thanks for admitting that you didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial. That said, what makes you qualified to comment on it?
aug 23, 2025, 11:19 pm • 1 0 • view
You should make more declarative statements without evidence. Very maga of you.
aug 24, 2025, 12:03 am • 0 0 • view
Why are you bringing up politics in a discussion regarding self-defense? I haven't. Is that your way of deflecting from your failed arguments? If you didn't know about the opening carry laws in WI, you definitely didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial too closely.
aug 24, 2025, 12:15 am • 2 0 • view
On top of that I made a moral argument. And in that, I am 100% correct. You are using a legal loophole to conclude Rittenhouse was in the right.
aug 24, 2025, 1:30 am • 0 0 • view
Only someone so willfully ignorant to condone Rittenhouses actions, would be MAGA. I understand the laws better than you and it was intended for hunting. The exception wasnt intended for children going to riots. The judges misinterpretation of the law is the issue.
aug 24, 2025, 1:29 am • 0 0 • view
How's this for making sense? Don't carry out an unprovoked attack on someone who is clearly armed. Sound reasonable? Nothing you've posted would've negated Kyle's right to self defense.
aug 23, 2025, 11:16 pm • 1 0 • view
I'm aware. 😂 And? Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state. An assault rifle is capable of selective fire. Kyle's wasn't. You said it yourself. Semi-auto.
aug 23, 2025, 9:29 pm • 0 0 • view