avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Ah, I see the confusion. I didnt realize I said that. Yes he crossed state lines. Yes, he had a gun. Yes he lied about that in court and said it was at a friends house. (Black maybe?)..I believe the "proof" that it was in Kenosha was the receipts to buy it. I dont trust his word. Sorry

aug 28, 2025, 7:47 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

It was at Black’s address because it was Black’s gun. There was no evidence that Rittenhouse ever owned it, nor any that he had ever taken it to Illinois or possessed it there. There was no evidence that he had even seen or handled it after the weekend that it was purchased in May until August 25th.

aug 29, 2025, 6:21 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Sure thing bud.

aug 29, 2025, 8:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

You are free to believe what you like. All I am saying is that there was no evidence. That is just a fact.

aug 29, 2025, 8:53 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

There was evidence, just none youd accept. Ill agree he got away with it. But hes EXTREMELY lucky to be alive.

aug 30, 2025, 6:31 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

And, with respect, if there is evidence, then why not present it? It is a really old debating deflection tactic when people make a claim of evidence, but decline to present it with the caveat of "You would only dismiss my evidence". How do you know if I haven't seen what you propose?

aug 30, 2025, 7:36 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Because its anecdotal and Im not evsn sure. I accept it. I just dont care.

aug 30, 2025, 8:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

Then, let’s be fair, in the absence of any evidence, he gets the benefit of the doubt, particularly in court. Agreed?

aug 30, 2025, 8:15 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

That being said, he won the case and is walking around a free man. Its the moral argument Im making. I certainly would not want my son doing this, nor would I allow it.

aug 30, 2025, 11:51 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

Rittenhouse was never witnessed provoking people, goading them, antagonizing, threatening anyone, pointing his gun at anyone, trying to start an argument or a fight, looking for any excuse to shoot. Nothing. So I am struggling to see what the supposed immorality of his conduct actually was.

aug 31, 2025, 4:00 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

I'll Kiss. 1. A child having a weapon of war. Bad. 2. A child having a weapon of war at riot. Bad 3. A child having a weapon of war at a riot, not his property, bad. 4. Kyle called a friend saying he killed Rosenbaum, but not medical care. Bad 5. Gross* could have shot him. He didnt.

aug 31, 2025, 4:44 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

The Khindris, who had nothing whatsoever to do with the shooting of Jacob Blake, had lost a fortune in uninsured stock to rampaging idiots. It is not difficult to see why they might have reached out to Nick Smith to watch the properties on night three.

aug 31, 2025, 3:57 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

I wouldn’t either, but in terms of a moral argument, what did he do that was immoral? It was naive maybe, and unwise, but immoral? Those civilians who descended on Kenosha in a bid to defend property did so because of what they saw as the unjustified destruction of peoples’ livelihoods.

aug 31, 2025, 3:53 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

This entire time ive conceded he "won" the court case, I just dont agree with 2 things. 1. The original statute WAS intended for hunting. What sense would it make otherwise? 2. The cops in the community clearly had a bias and Kyles posts prior to the shooting show ill intent at best.

aug 30, 2025, 11:50 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

There was no evidence that Rittenhouse had ever owned the rifle or had ever kept it. Black testified that he bought the rifle in his name on May 1st and that it was kept at his address in Kenosha. He still owned that gun when it was destroyed in 2022, and had to sign off on its destruction.

Video thumbnail
aug 30, 2025, 7:31 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

All the evidence of the shootings was exculpatory. There was nothing to suggest that he acted unlawfully. There was nothing in the videos or witness testimony that hurt his case for self-defense under WI s.939.48. Why do you think critics ignore this and focus on "He never should have been there" ?

aug 30, 2025, 7:28 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Because he never should have been there. You know this. I know this. If that were yoyr lid, would you say you did a good job parenting?? Would you advise your child to go to a riot with weapon of war?

aug 30, 2025, 8:09 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
longi1974.bsky.social @longi1974.bsky.social

No, but I would support his right to defend himself if he did.

aug 30, 2025, 8:14 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

You're not accepting evidence. -You discounted Officer Moretti's testimony. -Inserted your own statistic. "99.9% of the people weren't armed." -You insist that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm. Despite evidence to the contrary. You lack integrity.

aug 30, 2025, 7:57 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Cool story bro

aug 30, 2025, 8:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

Those are the facts.

aug 30, 2025, 8:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

You're free to prove otherwise. Oddly, you're making claims that the prosecution didn't even make. 🤔

aug 29, 2025, 8:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

Why are you making claims that the prosecution didn't even make? That's odd. Perhaps you can explain this.

image
aug 28, 2025, 8:33 pm • 0 0 • view