Is it even proper to refer to an executive order as "unconstitutional"? It's not a law, so isn't it just "illegal" or at least "spurious"? Or they should just go for the whole phrase "which he does not have the power to do".
Is it even proper to refer to an executive order as "unconstitutional"? It's not a law, so isn't it just "illegal" or at least "spurious"? Or they should just go for the whole phrase "which he does not have the power to do".
No replies