Finding a sub who's a fair replacement for every standard of missing batsman or bowler would be nigh on impossible. Would it even have been a great finish if England had sent out an extra no.3 bat in both innings?
Finding a sub who's a fair replacement for every standard of missing batsman or bowler would be nigh on impossible. Would it even have been a great finish if England had sent out an extra no.3 bat in both innings?
I get the arguments but this situation, whilst dramatic, was completely ridiculous