I wonder how many of the responses to this will be variants of "What are you going to do about it" from people who have no awareness whatsoever of what's possible [Hint: nothing]? Bonus points if it invokes minority powers that Republicans didn't actually have during the Biden administration.

Just say no

Absolutely correct. He should have license to practice law revoked forever. Do not let him be a judge in any court in USA

One day Trump won't be in office anymore-- when that happens, DO NOT let people like this off the hook!

You shouldn't be a democratic senator when you vote YES on the disgusting Charles Kushner nomination

No more yes votes on any appointees! We’ve seen what happens. No, no, nope. No more “helping” do you hear? No democrat should be voting for any of the atrocities coming from these redcoats!

bsky.app/profile/cweb...

Another miserable, insufferable prick. Is he related to Miller?

any more nice words for Republicans? The Cato Institute can't wait for your next fillibuster!

So what are we going to do about it?

Yes, and … there should be no such thing as lifetime appointments.

Amazing that this needs to actually be said.

So, uh... what are YOU doing to stop him? Voting against him isn't enough, you need to convince several Republican Senators to stand with you. Or you need to withdraw unanimous consent and slow everything in the Senate to a crawl. Otherwise... why bother telling us this stuff?

An individual nomination can proceed under regular order, except when waiving the maximum 30 hours of debate after cloture. Withholding unanimous consent would slow down this nomination hardly at all. And convince Republicans? Like whom? I'd like names of sane, decent GOP senators who are gettable.

And, what are you doing about it?

Talk to your colleagues! Put the pressure on!! There should not be a single vote in favor of this traitor!!

Ya think?

The next chance for SERIOUS CHANGE is mid-term elections ‘26. The opposition to don the con is 2:1 against! That includes counting 61 million CITIZENS WHO DID NOT VOTE IN '24. We should be talking to our neighbors enlisting their help to rid the USA of KING con in ‘26. DO WE CARE ENOUGH?

Yeah, several people that Democrats have been approving shouldn’t be in their positions. And yet, y’all keep approving them. What makes you think you won’t drop the ball on Bove too?

Damn people, I have been telling you people since February. You better arm up, I got a bad feeling that the mid terms is going to be rifle with lawlessness. Quiet protesting is not going to get it done.

So then you Senate Democrats finally have to come up with a plan to stop Donnie's appointees from getting rubber stamp approval--which means controlling your own guys from crossing the aisle to vote with the Repugs. Your filibuster has turned out to be meaningless.

@booker.senate.gov YOU HAVE CONFIRMED SO MANY OF HIS NOMS, and all you do is bullshit us and talk out the side of your neck! Nut the fuck up and STOP CONFIRMING his noms and SHOW us you’re not MAGA or STFU and resign! SHUT IT DOWN- NO FOR EVERY NOM!! WE DO NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS! WE are who

YOU answer to! Not your fucking donors, not the maga terrorist regime, not fucking aipac US!!! We the fucking people! Corporate “dems” are spineless diet maga fascists behind closed doors! DON’T you DARE confirm this Nazi!

Tr6mp does not like to follow the Law. He should be Impeached, but the MAGA in Congress doesn't want to.

Trump's MAGA Congress will confirm him. Of course they will. And they'll pass that godforsaken Big Ugly Bill, too. They want all democracy destroyed, with lower classes driven into poverty and death. They don't need us now: they have automation and AI. They want all control of power and resources.

Bove is a bad dude - just say NO

Does the power of a judge depend on people obeying the order? Why does this guy want to be a judge when he f,,,k their orders? Oh I get it. That means “I can do what I do but the rest of you can’t.”So my next question is: Is there any point in reasoning with this type of person?

Haven't you heard audio recordings from the Supreme Court? The Justice Department reserves the right to follow court rulings or not, just like every other government has before. Judge: "Ah — really?"

Then I sincerely hope you vote NO on it and just not give it lip service like you did the other Cabinet positions

I'm guessing that his statement here does indeed mean a no vote, like his votes against Hegseth, Gabbard, Kennedy, and Vought.

newjerseyglobe.com/congress/kim... According to this, Booker expressed "concern," but not regret, for voting for the handful he DID confirm. But he didn't go so far as Sen. Andy Kim to declare he wouldn't vote for any more Trump nominees.

He still voted against multiple nominees. And he is literally declaring that the Bove nomination is unacceptable. How this is therefore indicative that he's likely to vote for Bove is beyond me.

He voted for 4 of them, voted against 14, refused to vote for 3. If he's so set against it, why not just come out and say he won't vote for any more of them?

Because he can still be weaselly? Regardless, this is literally about Bove's nomination, which committee Dems responded harshly to.

I guess we'll see when they vote 🤷‍♀️

🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯