Shorter Judge Cannon: The Judicial Branch can prohibit the current Executive Branch from confidentially briefing leaders of the Legislative Branch about grave national security crimes committed by the incoming leader of the Executive Branch. Just like the Framers intended.
***except in the situation that a Republican current Executive Branch is being replaced by an incoming Democrat Executive Branch.
My favorite Originalists are the Situational Originalists.
Who will stand up to this petty tyrant?
11th circuit needs to rebuke her, along with SC. She has no jurisdiction.
I'm now following...I like the short and sassy version.
She’s on fire!!!!
And here I am thinking that Constitutional amendments need to go through the legislative branch. Constitutional Law Professors must be going nuts changing their syllabus from theory to hypothetical
OMG
There's fires burning. I just can't with her f*cking b*llshit corrupt idiotic rulings right now.
Well thank goodness the will and care of We The People isn't a priority, where would we be then?
What could possibly go wrong.
I’m confused. Shouldn’t it be the opposite to protect our republic from a nefarious incoming administration.
He neglected to include the /s
They better clap back loud and soon on this
Judge Cannon has an inalienable and imprescriptible right to pursue her happiness unencumbered by anything post-1315 Magna Carta was too woke
smh 1215 Even more PC in 1215 was prohibition of blessings for the ordeal
Nobody reads the footnotes, let alone the endnotes.
It's called a check on a balance! Or maybe a balance on a check?
Rule of law is done anyway. Release the report no matter what she says.
🤦♂️