Again, you haven't actually shown anything except your own bias regards what data you're including and what data you're excluding.

What do you want me to show? Filling deadlines by state? They are easy to look up. Georgia and NC 2024 results by counties? Also easy. Do I also have to prove to you that NH is a light blue state where republican can't do much to draw themselves an "easy" seat?

Yes, if you want me or anyone else who's skeptical to believe that Newsom's gerrymander idea was a good, brilliant idea versus setting Democrats up to fail, you have to prove it is in fact actually doable and will in fact actually mathematically provide useful results.

And certainly if you want me to listen to the claim that NY Times is just fearmongering, you have to actually first prove it's fearmongering. It's really annoying people have been trained into this wrongful entitlement to being believed just because you say something, vs having to show the data.

If you can find and read NYT article, you can also find and read all of the stuff I told you.

You haven't told me a single thing to "find and read". You've just made some vague wishywashy claims. Where's the data showing a pro-districting analysis?

This is not what I was disagreeing with lmao, I disagreed with NYT map of states and what "possibilities" are. I also think they are deliberately trying to scare democrats who aren't following this stuff closely. But keep arguing with imagined poster I guess.

"I also think they are deliberately trying to scare democrats who aren't following this stuff closely" OK, then prove it. bsky.app/profile/left...

Already blocked the other person for proving they're fake by running and hiding the second I asked them to prove the claims they're making. Now you're doing the same thing, where every time I ask for the counterdata you don't present any, yet you still insult and tantrum I don't believe you. 🤷‍♀️