avatar
Darrin Calvin @darrincalvin.bsky.social

Inflammable is older, comes from Latin inflamarre, "to set on fire" Two centuries later we get flammable because some wiseguy decided inflammable was confusing (because it kinda is) and they chopped off the in-. Instead of the new word replacing the old word tho we got both for double confusion.

apr 18, 2025, 6:01 pm • 22 0

Replies

avatar
beforedawn @beforedawnfan.bsky.social

We have genius and ingenius. And maybe another one that barely escapes my mind.

apr 19, 2025, 8:01 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
beachrat75.bsky.social @beachrat75.bsky.social

"Stable Genius"

apr 19, 2025, 11:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
dirtylilmonkey @dirtylilmonkey.bsky.social

Guessing, but I bet the guy who truncated it was one of our American cousins!😄

apr 18, 2025, 6:28 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
Darrin Calvin @darrincalvin.bsky.social

Yeah, no idea. Both M-W and OED note the first recorded usage was 1813 for flammable, but neither note a source. Actually, nvm, the online OED says the original source is a translation (of what, I dunno) by Thomas Busby, an English composer.

apr 18, 2025, 6:48 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Dr Craig Buchanan FSAScot @buchanan.today

Seriously though, since it specifies a translation, this is the most likely source: “About the same time (1813) Busby completed a translation of Lucretius into rhymed verse.” Lucretius wrote “The Nature of Things,” which is probably related.

image
apr 23, 2025, 3:39 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dr Craig Buchanan FSAScot @buchanan.today

The other original score of “Burn, Baby, Burn”?

apr 23, 2025, 3:26 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Catturds of TrootSochul @jorge-s.bsky.social

There was this guy in the US named Noah (1758–1843) who went from print shop to print shop, haranguing the compositors in his attempts to reform spelling. He knew nothing of Latin….

apr 18, 2025, 8:04 pm • 1 0 • view