Your point is what? Putin and the invasion are somehow excused because he didn’t invade earlier? Too ridiculous to argue tbh
Your point is what? Putin and the invasion are somehow excused because he didn’t invade earlier? Too ridiculous to argue tbh
I've not once said invasion was excused. That's what I mean by you being lazy. The point is that propaganda saying Putin has some imperial expansion plan is risible. If that was the case, he would have invaded earlier. I'm not supporting Putin, I'm educating myself about western interference.
You are 100% supporting Putin with what you write. Imperial expansion or not, Putin’s aim has clearly been to keep Ukraine subservient to Russia, just like Belarus and Georgia. He has said this himself, so you blaming the west is just you supporting him.
Criticising UK government action does not mean supporting Putin. Example - I believe: 1. Putin is a scary, asshole 2. NATO expansion has a role in Putin's desire for neighbouring states to be subservient to Russia. They're not mutually exclusive. I could have a better debate with a 9-year-old.
You are just a poorly camouflaged dictator shill. It’s the typical undeveloped mind of someone that dislikes the US/the west and ends up supporting the worst regimes simply due to them being opposed to the west. If Putin were concerned about NATO then maybe he shouldn’t start wars and invade
You know you've lost the debate Erik - you've offered nothing. You're right about one thing though, I definitely detest western foreign policy - it's what makes us the 'worst regimes' as you call it in your juvenile language. Try arguing with this: bsky.app/profile/shak...
So why do you live in the west?
Oh dear god! We're done Erik. 👋
Because you are a fake. You enjoy the freedoms of the west, while posting in support of dictators that you put you in jail or up against a wall. Or you are just sixteen years’ old and cosplaying as “socialist” Pathetic