So are we in disagreement then that provably untrue statements sent out to the masses is harmful? Or are we in disagreement that something should be done about it. I'm confused.
So are we in disagreement then that provably untrue statements sent out to the masses is harmful? Or are we in disagreement that something should be done about it. I'm confused.
I'm saying that people keep bringing up the "fire in a crowded theater" cliche to justify restricting first amendment rights for things that are not actually like shouting fire in a crowded theater.