avatar
Sharon @sharonk.bsky.social

like, in the grand scheme of things do i think electeds should avoid jargon? yes. but like, has anyone actually found an example of *electeds* using this language

aug 24, 2025, 5:53 pm • 68 3

Replies

avatar
frozenpillar @frozenpillar.bsky.social

there was a thread going around that actually tracked political comms and most cases were republicans feeding the outrage machine lol

aug 24, 2025, 6:02 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
WillNotBow @garryowen.bsky.social

.3 seconds google search produced this and many other examples of “birthing persons” used by elected bodies and then weaponized by the Right wing to paint Dems as out of touch weirdos that you can’t vote for x www.health.ny.gov/community/pr....

aug 24, 2025, 6:10 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
goldstar971.bsky.social @goldstar971.bsky.social

This isn't an elected body? It's an administrative office?

aug 24, 2025, 6:50 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
WillNotBow @garryowen.bsky.social

It’s an administrative body appointed by Democrats. Here’s an example of elected Democrats doing the same. An equally short google search could show you have the Right effectively weaponized it. council.nyc.gov/press/2022/0...

aug 24, 2025, 6:53 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
William Easley @williameasley.bsky.social

Tom has devolved to complaining about it appearing occasionally in legislation now.Caring about how something gets phrased in a bill that no deciding voter in an election will ever read is just looking for something to be mad about

aug 24, 2025, 5:56 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
WillNotBow @garryowen.bsky.social

You’ve all gone to “it isn’t happening” to “ok, it gets used in law, but Democrats aren’t saying it and voters aren’t hearing it” in record time.

aug 24, 2025, 6:12 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
William Easley @williameasley.bsky.social

I do think that the distinction between rhetoric and the wording in laws is an important line to draw. Voters care about what a law does and how it is sold. I do not think how something is phrased in a law or policy proposal matter unless it changes what the law actually does

aug 24, 2025, 6:17 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
WillNotBow @garryowen.bsky.social

They care. Democrats would be wise to stop handing effective weapons to the propagandists who use that phrasing to effectively portray Dems as weirdos that shouldn’t be near power.

aug 24, 2025, 6:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Emma-Rose DeLeon 🔞🏳️‍⚧️ 4HS Solis Year @emrosedeleon.bsky.social

Supposedly he has a clip of AOC saying "birthing person" once, but I think that says more about literally everybody else in the world than her.

aug 24, 2025, 6:06 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
GPT-Ern Malley @denam.bsky.social

Warren is the easy one here? Got dragged for it at the time

aug 24, 2025, 5:55 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
aohsu @aohsusometimesy.bsky.social

Big Structural Bailey. Third Way determined the lumpens HATE big structural Bailey

image
aug 24, 2025, 6:06 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
SCP @10-5.bsky.social

Yes! And they found exactly what you’d expect. It’s republicans dcinboxinsights.substack.com/p/was-it-som...

aug 24, 2025, 6:53 pm • 5 1 • view
avatar
Zetsubo @zetsubo.bsky.social

who gives a fuck? like actually who gives a fuck aside from outrage merchants and their marks? anyone else politically engaged enough to hear politicians say these things occasionally is not going to care

aug 24, 2025, 5:58 pm • 2 0 • view