Same

It's not as transparent "as an excel spreadsheet"

All I have to say is "provisional ballot policies" Every locale handles them differently

Also "every locale handles them differently" makes sound like there's an infinite number of ways to verify a voter's eligibility. It's not like that. Either you come back later with a valid ID, or they check for you and compare the signature on your registration.

And the shitty thing is, it's so transparent we can tell where voter suppression is happening because we can see excessive provisional ballots and long lines. It's right in front of our face.

Truth. And voting machines are used for suppression. They limit the booths available, they need to be rebooted, recalibrated, patched, and the crappy ones are always sent to the poorest precincts. I am with you on everything you are saying. Huge fan of Greg Palast. I think the most revealing /

case was Virginia and how they got rid of their voting machines and suddenly 2017 their results snapped to match their exit polls for the first time in years and since then. Washington and Colorado: v clean elections. Hand-marked paper and air-gapped recording and tabulation. Polls match results. /

The accusation against ES&S machines is that you see vote-flipping on one race on a ballot that becomes greater the larger the precinct. I saw this analysis in a statistics paper in 2012 looking at the Republican primary, and it's the accusation Roger Stone leveled at the Republican Party in 2015.

It's also the suggestion Election Truth Alliance has been finding in Clark County NV and North Carolina data. (And I dont see any indication the Election Alliance guys are aware of the 2012 work.)

Provisional ballots are still recorded and we know how many are cured.

You can get the counts from every county in the country.