i try not to kinkshame on here but i just saw someone call Dragonlance a "beloved setting" and i am frowning real hard rn
i try not to kinkshame on here but i just saw someone call Dragonlance a "beloved setting" and i am frowning real hard rn
I mean I loved it at the time, but the time was when I was 13 years old and I preserve that warm glow by never, ever, ever re-reading it.
there's a reason i refuse to rewatch Weekend at Bernie's and "because I am no longer 14 and it cannot possibly hold up to my memory of it" is that reason
Yeah. Some things you _suspect_ might have been visited by the Suck Fairy. Other things... you know in your goddamn bones.
I read the first two books, never played the setting, pretty happy to leave it at that also s/halflings/kender/g was kinda brilliant
in theory yes but making them playable was a giant mistake, their entire Thing is being a disruptive-ass GM nightmare
honestly I never learned anything about their mechanics, I just enjoyed the "not store-brand hobbits" part (also my benchmark for disruptive GM nightmare is everyone who wanted to play a two-swords drow ranger after a certain other book came out)
the amount of GM railroading in them is like "If the party does not pretend correctly, kill them"
It sure as heck is a setting