It’s not the doctors report published in Lancet, but I will be reading this thank you

upset that quizmaster trivia never used thomas morris as an article of the week. (maybe he's not wikipediaworthy?) still, a great briton, like this guy: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_...

And @jstor.bsky.social comes through www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2...

Interestingly, it appears that The Lancet reprinted the main article from the Provincial Medical Journal and Retrospect of the Medical Sciences - lightly edited, which I guess is what passed for an abstract in 1842 - but not the editorial note: archive.org/details/sim_...

BRILLIANT!

Here comes Reviewer 2

FIVE!!!! Sidenote: This search was prompted by a post/vasectomy sperm sample that literally looked like a normal sperm sample I wanted to know if there could be extra things to snip Apparently the answer is, yes

theonion.com/fuck-everyth...

I think of this every time I pass the razor aisle or shave my legs or pretty much all the time

I like how he just casually mentions he’s felt up thousands of dudes. Victorian medicine was wild.

I have some questions about the reported childhood injury in that second case. Did nursemaids crush little boys’ testicles so routinely as to hit one with an extra ball?