And encouraged

Probably still isn't legal, though.

Fuck legality. Death to the law.

Careful. That sword has two edges. Without those laws, you wouldn't be around to post.

Wrong. People existed before laws were made up. People will exist after laws are made obsolete.

That would require a rather broad redefinition of "people." Or a very narrow definition of "laws."

Laws are government tyranny. Death to all law and all government.

Laws represent social convention that deter bullies or strongmen from blowing your ass away just because they don't like what you're saying. Be careful what you wish for -- you might find you don't like it when you get it.

I would also disagree, while I’m not an anarchist, the rule of law has also been used to kill and destroy lives in favor of strongmen. Everything Hitler did was legal to the letter of their laws at the time. WHO MAKES THE LAWS, matters greatly.

Governments make laws. Government are corrupt, oppressive, tyrannical hierarchies.

Yes, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Wrong. Laws represent bullies and strongmen blowing people away (or caging/enslaving/impoverishing them) just because they don’t like what those people are doing, so they call it illegal. We are anarchists. We do more than wish for anarchism- we work towards it. Your fearmongering is powerless here.

Incorrect.

Legality is a very poor guide to morality.

The overlap between legal and moral is mostly coincidental, when it occurs at all.

That seems to depend on who gets to define "moral." Our government -- and they are not alone in this -- has been attempting to legislate morality for most of my lifetime. And that's a while now. And I know they were at it long before then. "Legal" = "moral" seems to be a paradigm of our culture.

Legal =\= moral. We are free and religiously compelled to define our own anarchist morality.

Tyranny anywhere is a threat to freedom everywhere.

Excuse me, but we are not 'murdering' them; we are 'culling the herd.'

Time to #eattherich

no it s not because you never know what s "behind"

Did you know that the exploding drone is the natural predator of face-eating leopards?

That orange shit-stain is going to rig and cheat every election he can't stop entirely. RepubliKKKans are going to win every election from now on. "Voting them out" will never happen, because voting will never work again. Voting will not save us now.

The whole point of many of the crumbling institutions in our society is to provide an alternative to vigilantism. The wealthy have forgotten this, so it's looking more like we will have to remind them.

Not likely to happen. We've been conditioned to believe "violence is NEVER the answer."

Things will change when the bread and circuses stop.

He and musk already admitted to hacking this last election and the Dems have done nothing about it.

Which is why the bad guys finally and ultimately win. They won, we lost. And there's nothing we can do about it, because we've been conditioned to believe "violence is never the answer."

Or stop buying stuff from them and deny them all services.

Is this account run by 14 year olds??

Weird way to say you want tyrants and oppressors around. Guess you’d have to be pretty immature to actually fight back against them huh? The good news is that 1.6K people have liked this post (so far) so your ageist assumption and your mistaking maturity for cowardice is practically irrelevant.

Hail

The only good Nazi is a dead one. And everyday I hope we'll finally start finding good Nazi in the US.

the creator of this meme clealerly hasnt read Animal Farm. Someone worse *WILL* take over.

Animal Farm is a fictional story about a farm with talking animals

Yeah. And? It's allegorical...

If i wrote a story where there were animals on a farm and everyone lived happily ever after, would that also be allegorical?

Yes, or if you put them on an Ark two by two.... Also had a happy ending... Different stories though. IIRC "Animal Farms" ending was so happy Pink Floyd got in there and played some fine, if angry instead of unhappy, music.

Can you perhaps think why "the person who said this CLEARLY hasn't read a fictional story where the author gets to declare every event that takes place in the narrative and determine the outcome to be anything they see fit" is not a useful way of assessing reality?

I mean, when you put it that way it sounds bad, but the point of that particular story IS that someone (this someone being pigs) WILL replace whom you overthrow that's worse than what's been overthrown, so we all know that then...what's the disconnect?

Again, that didn't happen. It's a fictional story. None of the events in the story actually happened. The point of the story is a fabrication.

I mean yes, as is all fiction? You don't find some of the greatest fictional works in history, including the works of Shakespeare, illuminating about human behavior in any useful way? I find that notion appalling. Science fiction becomes science reality given enough resources, wherewithal and time.

If someone told you that you should read The Turner Diaries in order to illuminate some aspect of human behavior in a useful way, what would your response be?

*if the three of us in this conversation know this about the story, where's the disagreement?

www.threads.com/@churchofsat...

"Violence is never an appropriate means for change" - people who have a huge stake of interest in things never really changing. Historically it's always been the prime motivator for change. If violence wasn't effective, we wouldn't have armed police and a military.

Mangione simp?

If the president of the United States isn't required to obey the law, then why the fuck should the rest of us?

Making them look fucking stupid is more fun.

I don't know how I feel about posts from the "Church of Satan" but I also can't say I disagree with this either.

This isn’t the Church of Satan. This is the Church of Satan Anarchist. Different name, different church, different beliefs. We aren’t Satanists. We are Anarcho-Satanists. Here’s our intro text- docs.google.com/document/d/1...

It's mostly "Satan" that I have a problem with not any particular organization with "satan" in their name.

Satan is a mythological embodiment of antiauthoritarianism.

As a Christian, I feel there are better ways to be antiauthoritarian. Yes, I realize it's my bias and prejudice speaking here, but it still makes me uncomfortable.

It's just a symbol, he's no more real than Zeus or Hades.

People used to believe Zeus and Hades were real too, would you fight with them over their beliefs simply because you don't believe their gods exist?

TBH, it's not worth taking away the security blanket of highly emotional beings, it will just make me suffer when they lash out.

Regardless of your personal beliefs, their are people who believe God, Satan, etc. exist. Forcing others to accept religious beliefs is one thing, but I do think I have the same right to voice that something makes me uncomfortable just as everyone else has, do I not?

Sure, why not? Reality is the consensus of its participants.

We are glad you are voicing discomfort. We are glad you feel discomfort.

Ignorance should be fought. Superstition should be fought.

Perhaps it's better to pick your battles instead of burning bridges before you march across them. You don't have to have everyone's approval to win a war, but you should at least play nice.

Wonderful. Very happy to cause a Christian discomfort.

And here I thought you didn't worship Satan. Weird response to a Christian who agrees with and just has a problem with your name if you were telling the truth.

We only worship ourselves. We encourage you to sit with your discomfort.

You worship a god that will strike his people down with no mercy for having doubts about him. Even if they did worship Satan/Lucifer, the only difference is that he defied God and is actively being punished. What happened to love the sinner not the sin?

That comment is out of left field and has nothing to do with the conversation. You clearly just have a problem with Christianity, which is your prerogative, but it's relevant to anything.

Shouldn’t it be an angry bunny?

The name started as a troll on a modded Minecraft server, I didn't have enough characters for 'an' if I remember correctly. I started using it for other accounts and kept it as "a angry bunny" simply because it bothered some people that it is grammatically incorrect.

You are such an angry bunny, angry bunny

Since Trump, I've been angrier than usual.

And a responsibility

Abusers know no other language, sadly.

Maybe it’s time to go for the $$$$ jugular of these GREEDY monsters? #insatiableGREEDlies #insatiableGREEDisDeaf #insatiableGREEDkills #BeAFascistsNightmare

Kill your tyrants! youtu.be/LR0Ts97huwc?...