avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

Don’t try and gaslight me now. If your response to we should slow cars down Is Actually slowing them won’t make a difference Then what you’ve said is that you don’t believe in physics. If you acknowledge more speed and more weight is worse in every single scenario; then nothing else to say.

image
aug 20, 2025, 3:21 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Kel @resentment.space

I never said slowing down doesn't make a difference lmfao you are reading into my post where I said I'm in favor of speed regulators because you're so mad that you're imagining something to be mad at.

aug 20, 2025, 3:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

F = ma directly implies that going faster produces more force given the same period of accel and mass. What I was saying is not that going faster wouldn't make a collision worse (duh) but that it doesn't take much speed to produce the effect in the clip. Now calm down before you hurt yourself LOL

aug 20, 2025, 3:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

Maybe that’s what you thought you said; but you didn’t. But if you now admit that you agree, speed actually is the factor (contrary to what you said earlier) then there is nothing else to say.

aug 20, 2025, 3:29 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

Anger-driven illiteracy folks. It's real

aug 20, 2025, 3:31 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

When someone says something that is misinterpreted by people reading it; that’s not illiteracy of the person reading it; it’s of the person writing it. If you didn’t mean that it was just as likely that the crash could occur at lower speeds; then don’t say that in the future.

aug 20, 2025, 3:36 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

Uh huh sure bud lol

aug 20, 2025, 3:36 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

In the future; when you’re trying to say something could’ve occurred - don’t say just as likely. Say “could’ve occurred” for example. “To be fair, this crash could’ve occurred while traveling at the legal speed limit” Im happy to help if you ever find yourself struggling with literacy

aug 20, 2025, 3:40 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

I didn't say just as likely grandpa you're imagining things again 🫡

aug 20, 2025, 3:41 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

Sorry, what did you say exactly? I must be forgetting.

aug 20, 2025, 3:42 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

If you agree that going faster increases the risk of collision as well as the harm from the said collison; then there is nothing else to be said here. You don’t need to keep quoting 5th grade physics at me. I understand it. Something it’s not entirely clear you do.

aug 20, 2025, 3:27 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

It is not clear to you that I do because you got so mad that you imagined I said something I didn't. I then illustrated what basic physics says about the case and you doubled down in your psychosis 🤭

aug 20, 2025, 3:30 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You’re the one who said this crash was equally as likely to have occurred at a lower speed. If that wasn’t what you meant; that’s ok. Sometimes it can be difficult to accurately convey your point

aug 20, 2025, 3:32 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kel @resentment.space

I said "just as easily" not "equally likely". Do you not know the difference between these phrases or are you just too mad to realize that you've been deluding yourself for 20 minutes in a mist of rage?

aug 20, 2025, 3:34 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
KangaRod @kangarod.bsky.social

Any crash that did occur at 40 is less likely to have occurred at 30; and will do less harm if it does occur. That’s just physics. Anyone who says (or believes) that speed is not the decisive factor in *every* collision ever; is objectively wrong.

aug 20, 2025, 3:22 am • 0 0 • view