Human (and animal) intelligence has been shaped by bodily experience. Recent research suggests that sensations followed by emotions come before thoughts meant to interpret them, therefore without a intelligence cannot exist. It is artificial non-intelligence. ANI.
Total non-sequitur.
How so?
How human intelligence devlops is just one datum. It says nothing at all about what is *required* for intelligence in general.
The LLMs clearly aren't intelligent but you took a massive leap
Oh, "a massive leap". So not "non-sequitur" after all? How do you think human mind works? And how many of your own actions result from conscious thought?
A massive non sequitur leap
I'm not totally serious, but tell me honestly, did you read (it was recent) that emotions arise in a body a moment before thoughts connected with those emotions? It would suggest that intelligence doesn't reside in the brain as much as it is interpreted by it.
Not just emotions but actual decisions to act (apparently). I don't have strong opinions about how intelligence works -I was just pointing out that your claim had a great big gaping hole where the argument should be.
That's how my brain works and I'm projecting, thinking that everyone can make these leaps. I'm happy being questioned further. I'm not a researcher and I rely on other people's work. But I feel instinctively that AI has a drawback of not having the body, and I think that's obvious to everyone.
I'm sorry I used "massive leap" now. I didn't anticipate you viewing that as a goo thing. I was just paraphrasing. I absolutely do not agree that having a body to provide inputs is a requirement. It's most certainly an *asset* but "drawback" is a long way from prerequisite.
Also potentially pertinent is that biology uses quantum mechanics.
well, it looks like a comment-shaped object