Point taken, but as with Liz Truss, her position (as opposed to the govts) was untenable. I just don't see how Reform could remove him if they thought it would save their party.
Point taken, but as with Liz Truss, her position (as opposed to the govts) was untenable. I just don't see how Reform could remove him if they thought it would save their party.
They are a shambolic party anyway - if it came to it, large numbers would quit the party/government. The issue would be how they would vote in a (Commons) non-confidence vote.
I agree. The concern would be that this not being a "party bugger than it's leader" would throw up a bigger problem in his removal, but I also note that people who work with him inevitably turn against him, so it may end up being a moot point.
The mechanism is actually very simple: you just pass a vote of No Confidence. All the paraphernalia of "letters in" and so on is just a mechanism to avoid the embarrassment of doing that. But internal rules - like a Tory leader being "safe from challenge" for a year - have no standing in Parliament.
Thank you. Appreciate the education!