No. We are arguing about the misuse of legal terms that can have lasting consequences. It is illegal for a deported person to reenter the country. 8 U.S.C. 1326 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
No. We are arguing about the misuse of legal terms that can have lasting consequences. It is illegal for a deported person to reenter the country. 8 U.S.C. 1326 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
It's illegal for someone to ignore a court order, such as the way the Felon in Chief is currently ignoring a supreme court and several lower court orders, but here we are.
It's not illegal, per SCOTUS, to break the law in pursuit of his official duties because Chief Justice Roberts forgot that the only power he has comes from words.
So let's not let the felons redefine words. It will not work in our favor. Citizens cannot be deported. If they are removed without due process that is an illegal exile.
Fine. Call it an exile. It is illegal for them to Exile people. As you said, the Supreme Court says he can break the law, including the one about not exiling people. He's still going to do it no matter what you call it. What matters is what we do about it after we remove him from office.
I'm afraid that if we get him impeached and removed or simply wait it out and he is replaced on January 20th 2029, he will never face Justice.
He won't. He has enough money and lawyers to gum up the system until the Big Macs claim his rotten husk.
I want two things. 1: Every enabler to face what they did. Legal, social, and financial repercussions are all on the table. 2: No future administration to accept the lie of "deporting a citizen" when they return to the border.
Exile is an illegal political act against a citizen. This is important if those citizen kids want to come back. Now, IANAL. I will happily take notes from an immigration attorney on this.
However when we cede the legal terms to allow fascist to redefine them, we cede the law to them as well.