The weirdest thing to me is that "working people" phrase rearing its head again in such a nonsensical context. So, what, unemployed people deserved shit in their rivers?
Replies
Pensioners and kids too, send them to the sewage beach.
jul 24, 2025, 8:11 am • 1 0 • view
Determining acceptable levels of pollution on a river-by-river basis based on local unemployment rates.
jul 24, 2025, 11:50 am • 0 0 • view
Only working people *matter*, though, and you know they're not referring to delivery riders after that other ad 😒
jul 24, 2025, 8:40 am • 0 0 • view
Also, what the utter fuck ARE they doing for working people? Everything’s still shit because they’re in thrall to Big Money.
jul 24, 2025, 8:13 am • 2 0 • view
You’d think “putting nature first” or even better,“putting communities first”, wouldn’t you?
jul 24, 2025, 8:11 am • 2 0 • view
The way other species that need the waterways and are being harmed have been ignored in all of this makes me want to cry tbh
jul 24, 2025, 8:13 am • 2 0 • view
The persistent centring of humans in this discussion is so symptomatic of the parlous state of our politics, yes.
jul 24, 2025, 8:14 am • 2 0 • view
If they were pressed they would almost certainly admit that yes, they think they do.
jul 24, 2025, 8:02 am • 4 0 • view
I can't believe in all of those pointless words, they didn't find a way to shoehorn "growth" in there, too.
jul 24, 2025, 8:40 am • 0 0 • view
Their solution is to purposefully make a shit river for the unemployed and a slightly less shitty river for the employed
jul 24, 2025, 9:07 am • 1 0 • view