Nonconsensually invading privacy for profit. Hmm. You mean like selling our private information to advertisers? Tech companies would never do such a thing.
Nonconsensually invading privacy for profit. Hmm. You mean like selling our private information to advertisers? Tech companies would never do such a thing.
Or digitally spying on people without their awareness or consent, in what are presumably private spaces where we assume a right to privacy. Like that? And then exposing the results of that spying to third parties without the person spied upon being informed of the information sharing. Like that?
Journalism is asking a subject a direct question to their face with the informed consent that they are being interviewed. The above, is not journalism. It's invasion and exploitation.
"You consented when you turned the device on!"