avatar
See also JDzed at clacks.link for Mastodon @jdzed.bsky.social

Same, but the two versions are very different things, with different constraints and even aims. Both worthy, IMHO, but only one remains beloved today to the best of my knowledge.

sep 3, 2025, 4:06 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
See also JDzed at clacks.link for Mastodon @jdzed.bsky.social

Besides, while they both have the unlike-able and even somewhat detestable Major Frank Burns, only one has the wonderful, complex (if rather stuffy) and very, very human Major Charles Emerson Winchester III as a vastly superior replacement.

sep 3, 2025, 4:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Elf M. Sternberg @elfsternberg.bsky.social

Frank Burns wasn't a complicated character. What he was, was the perfect character to make Margaret Houlihan a deeply complicated character. Of all the people in the unit, why was Houlihan banging Frank?

sep 3, 2025, 4:52 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Elf M. Sternberg @elfsternberg.bsky.social

Frank was married, morally compromised, and a blithering dolt. He was safe, in three different ways. The last episode made that clear; Honnicutt and Hawkeye were too tempting and she didn't want to go home with more war baggage than she could carry.

sep 3, 2025, 4:52 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
See also JDzed at clacks.link for Mastodon @jdzed.bsky.social

Hmm. That's an extremely convincing analysis of a question I've never thought to ask myself. #HeadCanonAccepted

sep 3, 2025, 4:55 pm • 1 0 • view