Why do they keep saying this? “Most of the cuts in the law are back-loaded and won’t take effect until well after the midterm elections.” Again, a *lot* of it is going into effect well *before* the midterms. acasignups.net/25/07/30/hea...
Why do they keep saying this? “Most of the cuts in the law are back-loaded and won’t take effect until well after the midterm elections.” Again, a *lot* of it is going into effect well *before* the midterms. acasignups.net/25/07/30/hea...
@charlesgaba.com, could you please tell us more about the changes to DPC agreements and HSA contributions? I'm definitely not rich, and I have a high-deductible ACA plan, so I rely on my direct primary care doc for urgent care, cheap lab tests, and so on.
Again: The improved ACA subsidies are scheduled to expire just 5 months from today, along with a bunch of other sabotaging of the ACA exchanges. That’s 24 million Americans who are gonna be screwed. acasignups.net/25/07/30/war...
Yeah, but billionaires can buy another yacht, trans-folks can be legally discriminated against, unqualified white men are making important decisions and, most importantly, the stewpit libtards were owned!
Trust Charles! Charles knows his shit...and ours, too!
They are already in effect. The moment DJT signed it into law. The wheels are already in motion.
They keep saying it because it’s true. Its a reality Dems need to acknowledge and plan to deal with.
Except it’s not really true, except by the strict definition of 51% as “most.” Even the work reporting requirements may be going into effect earlier in some states.
At some point, it's just semantics, but the implications are the same regardless. Dems cannot rely on voters feeling the pain before the midterms and understanding that the GOP did that. They need to lead and to explain what the bill did, and it's implications, and how to fix it.