This not only creates a Catch-22 (we need democracy to redirect AI, but AI has already damaged democracies) it also suggests that redirecting AI will be very difficult. But I still believe it’s not completely hopeless.
This not only creates a Catch-22 (we need democracy to redirect AI, but AI has already damaged democracies) it also suggests that redirecting AI will be very difficult. But I still believe it’s not completely hopeless.
medium.com/@iwanmorus/t...
📌
Great text. Thank you. I believe, the data that is made available to AI is what the governments can control and thus force the AI (companies) to control their algorithms. Governments can set the rules of critical data access and let only complying actors to use it.
This requires that there are many enough companies competing for the same data and the same end user service. If the market has already collapsed to winner take all monopoly, more powerful but controversial mechanisms are needed. Therefore it it very important to set the rules for data now.
The EU Acts are trying to do this but there are still a lot of loop holes and currently the regulation is primarily limiting while it should also be enabling to speed up the growth of the good companies, e.g. those pro-work actors. (I think that not all companies are only trying to reduce work)