That's true and also most liberals want more adoption, which requires unplanned pregnancies and poor mothers unable to care for them. The forced birthers are honest about it while pro-choice people pretend that isn't so.
That's true and also most liberals want more adoption, which requires unplanned pregnancies and poor mothers unable to care for them. The forced birthers are honest about it while pro-choice people pretend that isn't so.
Liberals want fewer unplanned pregnancies to occur, as well as greater access to abortion. The result would be fewer children born. Fewer children born, and the parents of the children having planned their pregnancies, means fewer kids in the system. We don't want more births.
I agree but you also love adoption. Difference is you pretend not to understand it requires unplanned pregnancies and people lacking means to keep the babies. Anti-choicers are at least honest about that. And my post was for adopted people, not you.
You're misunderstanding the liberal agenda. We don't want a higher total number of adoptions. We want a higher percentage of kids in the system to get adopted, but an overall lower number of kids in the system. Trust me on this. There's no dishonesty about it
No I do not misunderstand it all. I am not aware of any liberal opposition to the private infant adoption industry. Liberals adopt infants too. Anyway this is an Adoptees of Bluesky conversation. 🥚