Do you people even read the article before commenting? Literally the *fourth* sentence: “The findings contradict past statements from Attorney General Pam Bondi about an alleged list of Epstein clients.” Then if your attention can last half a page, it elaborates:
And that key information should also be in the headline, subhead, or at least the social media summary. It's not. Headlines are also news, also reflect editorial decisions, and should reflect key takeaways from the article. No consumer, no matter how diligent, can read every single article.
Oh bullshit. NPR has the right to presume its audience is literate and diligent-- anybody who isn't can just piss up a rope.
Or read past sentence #3 before complaining about missing context
💯
Be more responsible. There’s enough unreasonable attacks on the press from the far right. There can be legitimate criticism, but being unable to comprehend an article if it doesn’t start with a big gauge saying “Pants on Fire” is not it.