Make it clear that whether this ends in six months or in five years, it makes no difference to us. The only thing that will change from here on out is the Russian death toll. 3/3
Make it clear that whether this ends in six months or in five years, it makes no difference to us. The only thing that will change from here on out is the Russian death toll. 3/3
Is n't this exactly what is meant by "as long as it takes?" This was obviously too little in the past. No strategy, no deterrence and so on...
russian and Ukrainian death toll. π
And Europe has to retaliate for Russian acts of asymmetric warfare, like GPS jamming of airliners.
While in the meantime time surrendered everything elseβs to an equal evil beyond the pond president.
Agreed.
someday Europe will have to join the fight.
The problem with your (sic.) "solution" is, unfortunately, Russia seems to be in a much superior position to win a long-term war of attrition against Ukraine, with or without "limitless European support". The only thing that might change that, is "deployment of European troops" -- e.g. "WW3".
You should realize that Russia is a shit country with shitty economy, and Europe is in the zenith of its capability
By the way... I have no problem in stating that Putin is a dreadful, cynical war criminal, and that Russia has a lot of explaining to do, relative to its aggression against Ukraine. But that is a different thing from airily dismissing Russia's real war capabilities... which are "substantial".
You are repeating standard, rote neocon propaganda about Russia -- the same kind as the reactionary Western Far Right have been promoting, since at least 1946 or so. Reality is otherwise. The Russian economy has challenges, certainly; but it is well capable of sustaining a long, drawn-out conflict.