This is so pathetically obsequious and misleading that I wish I could cancel my subscription again
This is so pathetically obsequious and misleading that I wish I could cancel my subscription again
Is this the same army that massacred native Americans in the 19th century? Because that's in the Army's history too.
I regret that I have but one subscription to cancel for my country
Blah, blah, snooze, snore
It makes me sick how kiss-ass this is. And how wrong
I wanted to ask whichever recent graduate who wrote that if they knew what the Post's own photojournalists were doing on Jan 6 (embedded with Congress, hiding from attackers, etc). But apparently, the person who took the pic of the guy in the J6 hat was also there that day, but outside only(?).
The other three photos are credited to Getty Images, Shutterstock, and Reuters, they don't even appear to be photos by WaPo journalists?
Maybe that photo is meant pointedly. I’m assuming the headline writer and the photo editor are not the same person
True! I guess it's not the photographer's fault if someone else posts it in the wrong context.
Bezos just keeps bending over for the orange Nazi. Can’t wait for our Nuremberg trials
😆😆😆
💯 the only thing I regret about canceling my subscription is that I am no longer able to cancel it.
Why hasn’t everyone on the planet boycotted The Washington Post by now??!!!
It is revolting
i had the same thought exactly
Honestly the media coverage today has been sycophantic to an absurd degree it’s so embarrassing
That second shot? Just throwing a J6 guy in front a tank??? Amazing the days I discover I can be disappointed by them more
The second shot is also very weird? Like it looks heavily edited and off
I think cropped
I think it’s artificially lit, which is flattening the guy in front
Probably a flash. Photographers have rules around how they can edit as journalists and while I don't doubt wapo no longer cares is bad for your clips. I had a source with a really bad sty so we shot around it but couldn't photocopy it out (she was sensitive about it)
Photoshop jfc
Yeah I think it’s just weird lighting but like…it’s weird and bad? You’re telling me there was nothing else to use?
I doubt there were many visually interesting people there beyond the military
There are some very picturesque portapotties…
The way i cackled. And I'm not throwing shade. I've been visually interesting exactly once in my life. Election night November 2008 Ben's Chili bowl. Because we were the only mixed race group in the joint (Black, white and asian)
I mean the guys in the historic military outfits would have been way more top 4 for me
I'm counting them as military
Like they were so desperate to include a J6 guy with a tank that they kept this one in
The framing on the WaPo longshots is hilarious insofar as the trees obscuring the nonexistent “crowds” for plausible deniability, the close shot from directly behind a row of people to make it seem crowded
Framed that tank so that only the bleachers full of people show and not whatever sparsely populated space is likely behind it
Yeah that's a terrible photo but this is probably the right explanation. Also lol, the best they could do is a guy with a J6 hat using his phone while completely ignoring the tank behind him?
The hat looks odd
The brim is flat and the cap itself is too deep. Might be a bump cap?
Doesn't seem edited to me, that's just how it looks when you use flash on an outdoors shot.
Very much giving fake bro pasted in foreground
I feel like they should owe YOU money.
😂
Is that an old Sherman tank? My dude, you're not supposed to bring out the museum pieces in the military might parade.
I believe it was celebrating the 250th birthday of the Armed Forces, so they did a lot of period costumes.
Oh yeah,I forgot about that. Makes sense then.
Same here.
Cancel Amazon
That hat. Time to block the fuckers.
Ha that's exactly what I said 😆
If he was articulate at all, I’d wonder if he wrote it himself. Ffs
Insane watching the NYT call it low energy and note protests across the nation and then
I know. Admittedly, I’ve only seen clips but it was just a sad display.
Same. And this isn't even the first time I've thought it.
At this point I would have canceled like eight times if I hadn’t already canceled back when they pulled the Harris endorsement
Whenever I see the ads begging me to resubscribe it would be nice to have an easy to way to say "In fact, I would like to cancel my subscription AGAIN!"
Exhibit 1 bsky.app/profile/rudd...
Exhibit 2 bsky.app/profile/your...
Democracy dies in disingenuous
Yeah, this is propaganda.
Even in these attempted propaganda-ass photos it's obvious nobody was there
The j6 hat? That's one of the four pictures they decide to show here? That's a choice.
The hat looks photoshopped on. I suppose it isn't? But it's odd to choose a photo that looks so fake
the whole guy is photoshopped and so is the hat I bet
It does look fake, and if it is, that's just a deranged thing to fabricate
It’s not fake, it’s just weirdly flattened because they used a flash
Report their post for misinformation lol
Pathetic. Anything Bezos touches cannot be regarded with respect.
It’s striking how this kind of coverage can blur the line between reporting and glorification. Shouldn’t we be more critical when showcasing military power especially in a democracy?
Exactly the kind of article you’d expect to see if a media outlet had convinced itself its job was to control news instead of reporting it.
Can’t be too surprised that the Wapo coverage is propaganda seeing as the whole pathetic exercise was nothing but propaganda. There’s always the option to resubscribe and then immediately cancel again.
Not the first time I've wished I could recancel my subscription without resubscribing. I think they hope we'll fall for it.
Kowtowing and the Amazon Basics version of reporting. Blandly obsequious.
I live 10 minutes outside DC and was on 66 and the beltway today and it felt like a ghost town for a Saturday here.
Also what is that sentence structure? Why did the author put "on Saturday" in the first clause? It makes the reader think that a different date will be coming for the rest of the list. Is it just so they can avoid starting with a preposition but get the date in there ASAP?
What were you watching🤣