Almost as if I'm not presenting it as a model and he's either bad at reading or lying because he wants to score imaginary internet points.
Almost as if I'm not presenting it as a model and he's either bad at reading or lying because he wants to score imaginary internet points.
Almost like systems of justice are not an a la carte menu where you can pick random bits and slap them together.
That's funny because the history of legal systems would definitely beg to differ on this point.
Can you let me know what town meeting you're going to go to to suggest implementing Bedounic blood feuds? I just want to watch how that goes down.
Obviously I'm not proposing that, but you'd have to read for yourself instead of just taking what the Nazi-whisperer says at face value.
You literally said “here’s a system with lower incarceration rates” and it’s literally systemized murder
Then why are you presenting it
I mean this is literally what you're doing, if you're not proposing it as best practise from a peer bsky.app/profile/opin...
I'm presenting it to illustrate how straightjacketed our thinking about the nature of policing is and how there are other ways to think about justice that have their own problems but might still teach us stuff.
Thank you for confirming that you're "pontificating on the nature of law enforcement". You could argue that that is in fact worth doing (I mildly agree), but instead you're claiming that you're not. Strange approach