Also my take. Age isn't necessarily qualifying or dequalifying. I've seen young people have an uncommon level of maturity and older people have an uncommon amount of vigor. Whatever the generation, faith, trust and respect need to be earned.
Also my take. Age isn't necessarily qualifying or dequalifying. I've seen young people have an uncommon level of maturity and older people have an uncommon amount of vigor. Whatever the generation, faith, trust and respect need to be earned.
How did Larson earn the retirement of the prior holder of his seat?
Anyone can run. That doesn't require his retirement. It's the trust, respect and faith that are earned.
As I said from the start, and as you continue to ignore, incumbents have power unrelated to their actual performance or qualifications that give them a significant advantage over challengers.
Obviously, your point wasn't compelling - no matter how many times you repeat it. No one has to step aside because you stomp your foot and say so. You seem to have that bad. People have been winning elections by defeating incumbents for a long time if they earn the votes.
It was compelling enough for you to avoid actually addressing it *yet again*